A minus sign in the gravitational potential

In summary: However, the cosmological constant is still needed to keep the universe from expanding too fast.The Hubble constant is not a constant either (except for a universe dominated by - a cosmological constant). Anyway, that has little to do with the cosmological constant, which indeed is a constant. You could have other forms of dark energy that display a different evolution, but by definition the cosmological constant is constant.
  • #1
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,699
371
So we have the Newtonian gravitation potential given by ##\phi_M(r)=-GM/r##, and in class the teacher said that the Newtonian force is given by ##F_m = -m\nabla \phi_M(r)##.

Now, I was thinking about what was taught in UG or high school, isn't the force should be ##F_m = GmM/r^2##, if I plug the above potential I get a minus sign, i.e ##-(GmM/r^2)\hat{r}##.

So I asked my current teacher in class about that, it seemed he didn't take notice of this remark.

Am I right?
Also in Wiki we have the potential with a minus sign, I guess someone would have noticed this by now, right? :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The force you quote without the minus is just the magnitude of the force. The direction of the force is towards the gravitating body, ie, towards smaller r. The unit vector ##\hat r## is directed away from the gravitating body and that expression is a vector expression. To point in the right direction, the minus sign is necessary, i.e., ##-\hat r## is a unit vector pointing towards the gravitating body.
 
  • Like
Likes MathematicalPhysicist
  • #3
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Now, I was thinking about what was taught in UG or high school, isn't the force should be ##F_m = GmM/r^2##, if I plug the above potential I get a minus sign, i.e ##-(GmM/r^2)\hat{r}##.
The minus sign is correct. Remember, ##\hat{r}## points away from the center, but gravity points towards the center. So the minus sign is required to ensure that gravity is attractive rather than repulsive
 
  • Like
Likes MathematicalPhysicist
  • #4
Dale said:
The minus sign is correct. Remember, ##\hat{r}## points away from the center, but gravity points towards the center. So the minus sign is required to ensure that gravity is attractive rather than repulsive
Thanks, makes sense!
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
  • #5
BTW, in class the teacher said something about the cosmological constant.

He said something along the lines that it's increasing with time, and as that for astronomical distances much greater than the Earth to sun's distance Newton's gravitational law breaks down, it doesn't work anymore;
Now if that's the case how exactly do you fix it do you still assume such a potential as in my OP, or something with ##1/r^\alpha## where ##\alpha>1##, or some other function of the distance?
 
  • #6
MathematicalPhysicist said:
He said something along the lines that it's increasing with time, and as that for astronomical distances much greater than the Earth to sun's distance Newton's gravitational law breaks down, it doesn't work anymore;
Depending on how precise you are, Newton’s law of gravitation breaks down on much smaller scales. For example, the perhelion precession of Mercury needs general relativity to get a satisfactory explanation.

That the cosmological constant would increase over time would break the concept of it being a constant. It is difficult to interpret what your professor said without knowing exactly what he said.
 
  • #7
Orodruin said:
Depending on how precise you are, Newton’s law of gravitation breaks down on much smaller scales. For example, the perhelion precession of Mercury needs general relativity to get a satisfactory explanation.

That the cosmological constant would increase over time would break the concept of it being a constant. It is difficult to interpret what your professor said without knowing exactly what he said.
I agree that it would contradict it, but don't we have the oxymoron term: running coupling constants, which I must confess I don't know quite a lot of but it sounds by its name that the constants don't stay constant.
 
  • #8
MathematicalPhysicist said:
I agree that it would contradict it, but don't we have the oxymoron term: running coupling constants, which I must confess I don't know quite a lot of but it sounds by its name that the constants don't stay constant.
The Hubble constant is not a constant either (except for a universe dominated by - a cosmological constant). Anyway, that has little to do with the cosmological constant, which indeed is a constant. You could have other forms of dark energy that display a different evolution, but by definition the cosmological constant is constant.

Again, without knowing more of exactly what your professor said, it is impossible to judge if you misunderstood it, if he was "bending the truth", or if he was simply wrong.
 
  • #9
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Now if that's the case how exactly do you fix it do you still assume such a potential as in my OP, or something with 1/rα1/rα1/r^\alpha where α>1α>1\alpha>1, or some other function of the distance?
It winds up being a little more complicated than that. You fix it with General Relativity. In GR there is not always a gravitational potential, in particular the spacetime used to describe the universe on cosmological scales is one of the spacetimes that do not have an associated potential
 

1. What does a minus sign in the gravitational potential signify?

The minus sign in the gravitational potential signifies that the potential energy decreases as the distance between two objects increases. This is in accordance with the law of gravity, which states that the force of attraction between two objects decreases as the distance between them increases.

2. Why is there a minus sign in the gravitational potential equation?

The minus sign in the gravitational potential equation is a convention that is used to indicate that potential energy decreases with distance. It is also used to ensure that the potential energy is always a negative value, as it represents the work done by the gravitational force in bringing two objects together from an infinite distance.

3. How does the minus sign affect the overall gravitational potential energy?

The minus sign affects the overall gravitational potential energy by making it a negative value. This indicates that the potential energy is always decreasing as the distance between two objects increases. The magnitude of the potential energy also decreases with distance, following an inverse square relationship.

4. Can the minus sign in the gravitational potential be ignored?

No, the minus sign in the gravitational potential cannot be ignored. It is an essential component of the equation and reflects the fundamental nature of gravity as a force of attraction. Ignoring the minus sign would result in incorrect calculations and interpretations of the potential energy between two objects.

5. Does the minus sign affect the direction of the gravitational force?

No, the minus sign in the gravitational potential does not affect the direction of the gravitational force. The direction of the force is determined by the direction of the displacement between two objects. The minus sign only affects the magnitude and sign of the potential energy, not the direction of the force.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
524
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
301
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
726
Back
Top