A A part in a solution for exercise 1.24 from Atiyah-MacDonald

  • Thread starter Thread starter mad mathematician
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation solution
mad mathematician
Messages
126
Reaction score
20
In the part below where the author of this solution, wants to show that: ##a\vee (b\wedge c)=(a\vee b)\wedge (a\vee c)##, in the third equality he adds ##2ac+2ab+2abc=2a\wedge(b\vee c)##; can someone explain to me why can we do this here?
1731915866380.png

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a Boolean ring ##a^2=a##, so ##2x=(2x)^2=4x^2=4x##, therefore ##2x=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes mad mathematician
Yes, I forgot about it.
Got confused between rings,algebras and lattices... :oldbiggrin:
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K