A Pattern I Noticed: -1 Inverts Everything?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NegativeOne
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of applying -1 to various mathematical operations and the resulting inverses. Participants explore the implications of this pattern across addition, multiplication, exponentiation, and hyper-exponentiation, examining whether there is a deeper theory or established mathematical framework that supports these observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a pattern where applying -1 to an operation results in the inverse of that operation, detailing examples for addition, multiplication, and exponentiation.
  • Another participant confirms that -x is the additive inverse and x^{-1} is the multiplicative inverse, suggesting that the use of "-1" for other inverses is merely conventional.
  • A different participant claims that x^^-1 equals 1, providing reasoning based on the properties of exponents and their inverses, and attempts to extend this reasoning to hyper-exponents.
  • One participant questions the notation "^^" used for hyper-exponents, stating it is not standard and suggesting that the discussion is fundamentally about basic arithmetic.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster might find interest in abstract algebra, implying a connection to the concepts discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the patterns observed, with some agreeing on basic definitions of inverses while others contest the depth and implications of the proposed relationships. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity and implications of the proposed patterns.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unconventional notation and assumptions about operations that may not align with standard mathematical definitions. There are also unresolved questions about the nature of hyper-exponentiation and its inverses.

NegativeOne
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, I was thinking about math (Which I do a lot), and I noticed a pattern:

Applying -1 to any number through an operation changes it to the inverse of the operation it repeats:

Adding -1 changes to _____________ inverse
Multiplying by -1 changes to additive inverse
Raising to the power of -1 changes to multiplicative inverse
Raising to the hyper-power of -1 changes to exponential inverse
Raising to the hyper-hyper-power of -1 changes to the hyper-exponential inverse

The most basic operation is adding 1. Adding -1 inverts adding 1.

Adding numbers is repeated additions of 1. Multiplying by -1 inverts it to it's additive inverse such that adding it simplifies it to it's additive identity, 0.

Multiplying numbers is repeated additions of numbers. Raising to the -1 power inverts it to it's multiplicative inverse such that multiplying it simplifies to the multiplicative identity, 1.

Exponents is repeated multiplying of numbers. Raising to the -1 hyper-power inverts it to it's (What I call) exponential inverse such that raising X to X^^-1 you would get the exponential identity, _________.

And so on and so fourth.
I apologize if it's difficult to understand (And it's probably impossible to understand the exponents part, because addition and multiplication have the commutative property, so I didn't know whether it would be x^(x^^-1) or (x^^-1)^x).

I just wanted to show a pattern I saw, and I apologize if it is in the wrong section. Number patterns was the most similar thing I could find to this (Operational patterns).

Does anyone know of some sort of theory about this? I'm usually pessimistic (Thus my name is a double entendre), so I doubt I discovered some new pattern...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is true that -x is the additive inverse of x and that x^{-1} is the multiplicative inverse. The use of "-1" for other "inverses" is just convention.
 
Well, I figured out that x^^-1 = 1. Of course I could be wrong, but...

You can extract x^6 to xx^5, and you can extract x^^6 to x^(x^^5).

You can change x^6 to (x^7)/x, without changing value. Just the same, you can change x^^6 to (I meant this to mean x root) x√(x^^7)

Why? We know that exponents is repeated multiplication, and when we multiply numbers, we add to the exponents. We know that when we divide (Inverse of multiplying), we subtract from the exponents. We can apply the same logic to hyper-exponents if we change multiplying to exponents and division to roots (Since roots are the opposite of exponents).

We know that H-exponents (Hyper-Exponents) is repeated exponentiation, which means when raising (x^^4)^(X^^5), we get x^^9. If instead of exponentiation, we could take its root (Inverse), in which case we should subtract: (x squared root) (x^2)√x^^5 = x^^3

That being said, x^^-1 = x√(x^^0) = x√1 = 1

1 can be said to be the exponential identity, because x^1 = x
 
What do you mean by "^^"? That is not standard notation.

You seem to be making a big deal out of what is, basically, arithmetic.

The symbols used for operations, how we write identities and inverses, is, as I said before, convention. Yes, the convention for inverse functions if f^{-1}. There is no "deep" mathematics involved.
 
I can tell you this: you might be interested in abstract algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K