Insights A Physics Misconception with Gauss’ Law

AI Thread Summary
Gauss' Law is often misunderstood, particularly when transitioning from lower to upper-level electromagnetism courses. A common misconception arises when students incorrectly apply Gauss' Law to systems lacking spherical symmetry, leading to erroneous conclusions about electric fields. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the limitations of Gauss' Law and emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of vector calculus to properly grasp electromagnetic concepts. Many students struggle with these complexities due to oversimplified teaching methods that can hinder their learning. Addressing these misconceptions can significantly aid students in mastering electromagnetism.
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
22,802
Reaction score
14,854
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes topsquark, bhobba, vanhees71 and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Orodruin said:
I kid you not. After doing very well in lower level undergrad physics I moved onto the Griffiths level class and I got a 1/30 on the first test because I applied Gauss’ Law to circular ring with linear charge density proportional to ## /cos /theta ##. Find the field on the axis. And since ##/cos /theta## evaluates to ##0## when integrated over ##\left[ 0, 2 \pi \right] ## I thought the field was also ##0##.

I really thought at the the time that Gauss’ Law was all that I needed to know. I asked my professor if the grade was a mistake and he said “no your performance was truly dismal”.

I ended up retaking the class and studied my ass off by doing damn near every problem in the first 7-8 chapters and ended up earning his respect “I saw how hard you worked and I am very pleased with your progress”.

Realizing the limitations of Gauss’ Law might be trivial for those who have had years of experience but it’s a huge stumbling block for a lot of people (not just me) making the jump from lower level E&M to upper level E&M so I’m sure some younger students will benefit greatly from this article.
 
  • Like
Likes Chikitai, bhobba, Delta2 and 4 others
PhDeezNutz said:
Realizing the limitations of Gauss’ Law might be trivial for those who have had years of experience but it’s a huge stumbling block for a lot of people (not just me) making the jump from lower level E&M to upper level E&M so I’m sure some younger students will benefit greatly from this article.
This is the hope. I have seen this kind of error ”more than once” here at PF.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, vanhees71 and PhDeezNutz
Orodruin said:
This is the hope. I have seen this kind of error ”more than once” here at PF.

So I’m not alone!
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
You are not, and in my opinion it's the result of some well-meaning didadictics to "simplify" but making the subject in fact more complicated. There is some unfortunate idea in the didactics community that "math is too difficult". Of course, it's some effort to learn the math, and here it's vector calculus, which is a lot of material, but at the end it makes the physics more easy to formulate: The Maxwell equations in their "local form", i.e., as differential equations are the fundamental equations. The integral form can be easily derived from them when needed, and usually they are "more complicated" than the "local form".
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, BvU, PhDeezNutz and 2 others
Excellent thread.

Thanks
Bill
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
83
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top