A problem about non-separable Hilbert space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of non-separable Hilbert spaces, specifically focusing on completeness and the convergence of series within these spaces. Participants explore the implications of absolute convergence and the application of the monotone convergence theorem, as well as the use of limits and limsup in the context of series and functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the difficulty in proving completeness in non-separable Hilbert spaces, particularly questioning the applicability of the monotone convergence theorem.
  • One participant states that a space is complete if every absolutely convergent series converges, providing a sequence in a pre-Hilbert space as an example.
  • Another participant raises questions about the use of the monotone convergence theorem and the definition of absolute convergence in the context of the series.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the exchange of limits and series, with participants discussing the conditions under which such exchanges are valid.
  • Some participants mention the use of limsup as a necessary tool when limits do not exist, referencing Fatou's lemma as a potential related concept.
  • There is a discussion about how to prove certain inequalities involving limits and series, with participants seeking clarification on the steps involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of theorems and the validity of certain mathematical steps, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the issues raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their arguments, such as the dependence on definitions of convergence and the conditions under which limits can be exchanged with series. These aspects remain unresolved and are subject to further exploration.

prophetlmn
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
also see
http://planetmath.org/exampleofnonseparablehilbertspace
QQ??20130704175847.jpg


the main difficulty is about the completeness, which is hard to prove, the author's hint seems don't work here, for you can not use the monotone convergence theorem directly , f(x)χ[-N,N]/sqrt[N] is not monotone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let your pre-Hilbert space be ##H## with norm ##\|~\|##. It is known that a space is is complete iff every absolute convergent series is convergent.
Thus let ##(f_n)_n## be a sequence in ##H## such that ##\sum_n \|f_n\|## converges (to a number ##A##). Thus by monotone convergence:

\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_n \|f_n \chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 = A

Thus for each ##N##, we have that the series ##\sum_n \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2## converges. Since ##L^2## is complete, we have that ##\sum_n f_n\chi_{[-N,N]} = g_N## for some ##g_N\in L^2##.

Now, if ##M>N##, then ##g_N\chi_{[-N,N]} = g_M\chi_{[-N,N]}##. Thus we can glue the ##g_N## to a big function ##g##. Now

\begin{eqnarray*}
\|g - \sum_{n=1}^m f_n\|
& = & \lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| g\chi_{[-N,N}] - \sum_{n=1}^m f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
& = & \lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
&\leq & \limsup_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 \\
&\leq & \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\|\\
& \rightarrow & 0
\end{eqnarray*}[/tex]
 
micromass said:
Let your pre-Hilbert space be ##H## with norm ##\|~\|##. It is known that a space is is complete iff every absolute convergent series is convergent.
Thus let ##(f_n)_n## be a sequence in ##H## such that ##\sum_n \|f_n\|## converges (to a number ##A##). Thus by monotone convergence:

\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_n \|f_n \chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 = A

Thus for each ##N##, we have that the series ##\sum_n \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2## converges. Since ##L^2## is complete, we have that ##\sum_n f_n\chi_{[-N,N]} = g_N## for some ##g_N\in L^2##.

Now, if ##M>N##, then ##g_N\chi_{[-N,N]} = g_M\chi_{[-N,N]}##. Thus we can glue the ##g_N## to a big function ##g##. Now

\begin{eqnarray*}
\|g - \sum_{n=1}^m f_n\|
& = & \lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| g\chi_{[-N,N}] - \sum_{n=1}^m f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
& = & \lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
&\leq & \limsup_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 \\
&\leq & \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\|\\
& \rightarrow & 0
\end{eqnarray*}[/tex]

thanks for your help,the proof is very clear,the key point is 'a space is is complete iff every absolute convergent series is convergent',I don't know this before, it's again the old truth 'take a different approach'
 
I still have two little problems
(1)what do you mean by 'Thus by monotone convergence',I mean don't you just use the definition of
##\sum_n \|f_n\|##

(2)why you use limsub in the last three steps
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
&\leq & \limsup_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 \\
&\leq & \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\|\\
\end{eqnarray*}

what's wrong with
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
&\leq & \lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 \\
&= & \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\|\\
\end{eqnarray*}
 
Last edited:
prophetlmn said:
I still have two little problems
(1)what do you mean by 'Thus by monotone convergence',I mean don't you just use the definition of
##\sum_n \|f_n\|##

You exchange a series and a limit. This is not always allowed.

(2)why you use limsub in the last three steps
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\left\| \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\right\|_2\\
&\leq & \limsup_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 \\
&\leq & \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\|\\
\end{eqnarray*}

Because if ##x_n\leq y_n##, then this does not imply ##\lim_n x_n\leq \lim_n y_n##. This is only true if the limits exist. To solve this, we use limsup.
 
micromass said:
You exchange a series and a limit. This is not always allowed.



Because if ##x_n\leq y_n##, then this does not imply ##\lim_n x_n\leq \lim_n y_n##. This is only true if the limits exist. To solve this, we use limsup.

so you mean here we should use something like Fatou's lemma?
 
prophetlmn said:
so you mean here we should use something like Fatou's lemma?

Yes.
 
micromass said:
Yes.
So we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_n \|f_n \chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2\\
&\leq & \sum_n\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \|f_n \chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2\\
\end{eqnarray*}
?
if so how to prove it?i.e. how you get the following

\begin{eqnarray*}
\limsup_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 \\
&\leq & \sum_{n=m}^{+\infty} \|f_n\|\\
\end{eqnarray*}

and I think when you say'You exchange a series and a limit. This is not always allowed' you mean an exchange like this kind?i.e how you get
\lim_{N\rightarrow +\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_n \|f_n \chi_{[-N,N]}\|_2 = A
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
710
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K