1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A problem from giamcoli ( it is )

  1. Oct 31, 2006 #1
    a problem from giamcoli ( it is urgent )

    i am trying to solve this problem for several days. pls help me. it is from giancoli 3. edith.
    a heavy steel cable of length L and mass M passes over a small massless,frictionless pulley. a)if a length y ahngs on one side of the pulley ( so L-y hangs on the other side) calculate the acc of the cable as a fuction of y b)calculate the vf of the cable as a function of y( y is changing)... (the book gives a hint that "use the chain rule and integrate)

    i ve found the acc= g*(2*m*y-m*L)/m*L ( i hope it is so )
    but how can i find the V.... i know a=dv/dt but y,v,t is not constant there and i dont know what i do with 3 non-onstant terms?????
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 31, 2006 #2
    Steel Cable Question

    [tex]a = g \frac{2y - L}{L}[/tex] (your masses cancel)

    I made the substition off 'acc'. Differentiate it with respect to time and then substitute your 'dt'. You'll should get a [tex]\delta t / \delta y[/tex] term in this; but this is [tex]\frac{1}{v}[/tex], so now your integral will calculate [tex]v^2[/tex].
  4. Oct 31, 2006 #3
    thank you very much but;

    thanks but i haven't unsdetstood well what you wrote. could u give a bit more explaination?
  5. Oct 31, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I'm not sure if this is what BerryBoy was saying, but maybe it is what he meant

    a = dv/dt = (dv/dy)(dy/dt) = v(dv/dy)

    You can use this to separate variables and integrate.
  6. Oct 31, 2006 #5
    i understood

    i understood what you say. and i found this answer( i hope it is true);
    thanks berrboy and olderdan.
  7. Oct 31, 2006 #6
    Maybe I made a mistake, but I got the [itex]y^2[/itex] with the minus sign.

    [tex]v_{f}^2 = 2gy ( 1 - \frac{y}{L} )[/tex]

    Last edited: Oct 31, 2006
  8. Nov 1, 2006 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The indefinite integral should have the opposite sign from what you have. Unfortunately, the indefinite integral creates the impression that v^2 is negative when the sign is corrected. That of course cannot be. A constant needs to be added to the indefinite integral to ensure that v^2 is zero at some initial y value (of not less than L/2), where the initial velocity is known (probably zero, but it could start with some velocity.)
  9. Nov 1, 2006 #8
    But I used a definite integral (from [itex]t_0[/itex] to [itex]t_f[/itex]). I did this because [itex]y(t)[/itex] at these points becomes y and L respectively.
  10. Nov 1, 2006 #9
    OK, realised that in my equation, I've made the assumption:
    [tex]y(t_f) = L[/tex]
    So it is only valid if the steel cable falls completely to the side of y.

    OlderDan: But I still disagree with with your statement on my equation. y/L is always less than 1, if it were the other way around then you would get a complex answer.

    I also did this problem again and now decide there is no factor of '2' in the answer.

    Best Regards,
  11. Nov 1, 2006 #10


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    OK.. It's not that we are getting different results. We are just using different letters to represent things. The way the problem was stated, and the way the acceleration was expressed in your post #2, y is a variable. In your last result, y is a constant (the initial value of y) and you are finding the velocity only at "the end" when the variable has the value L.

    [tex] ma = \frac{m}{L}g\left[ {y - \left( {L - y} \right)} \right] = mg\left( {\frac{{2y - L}}{L}} \right) [/tex]

    [tex] a = g\left( {\frac{{2y - L}}{L}} \right) [/tex]

    [tex] v\frac{{dv}}{{dy}} = g\left( {\frac{{2y - L}}{L}} \right) [/tex]

    [tex] vdv = g\left( {\frac{{2y}}{L} - 1} \right)dy [/tex]

    [tex] \frac{{v^2 }}{2} = g\left( {\frac{{y^2 }}{L} - y} \right) + C [/tex]

    [tex] C = g\left( {y_o - \frac{{y_o ^2 }}{L}} \right)[/tex] where [itex] v [/itex] is zero at [itex] y_o [/itex]

    [tex] v^2 = 2g\left( {\frac{{y^2 }}{L} - y + y_o - \frac{{y_o ^2 }}{L}} \right)[/tex] for any [itex] y [/itex] starting from rest at [itex] y_o [/itex]

    [tex] v^2 = 2g\left( {\frac{{y^2 }}{L} - y + \frac{L}{4}} \right) [/tex] if [itex] y_o = \frac{L}{2} [/itex]

    [tex] v_L ^2 = 2g\left( {y_o - \frac{{y_o ^2 }}{L}} \right) = 2gy_o \left( {1 - \frac{{y_o }}{L}} \right) [/tex] when [itex] y = L [/itex]

    [tex] v_{\max } ^2 = g\frac{L}{2}[/tex] when [itex] y_o = \frac{L}{2} [/itex] and [itex] y = L[/itex]
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2006
  12. Nov 1, 2006 #11
    OK, I'm happy now. I get the same answer (a different way mind - I never like using indefinite integrals). Sorry to have caused confusion; I should've written [itex]y_0[/itex] when I was referring to the initial overhang. Also sorry that OlderDan had to write all his working, it would've taken me a long time to write all that.

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: A problem from giamcoli ( it is )