A problem involving thin film interference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on thin film interference and the phase changes that occur when light transitions between media of different refractive indices. Specifically, it confirms that a ##\frac{\lambda}{2}## phase change occurs at both the air-plate and plate-glass interfaces, leading to the condition for constructive interference expressed as ##t=\frac{m\lambda}{2n_F}##. The minimum non-zero thickness for constructive interference is established as ##t=\frac{\lambda}{2n_F}##. The reasoning presented is validated as correct by other participants in the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin film interference principles
  • Knowledge of refractive index and its implications
  • Familiarity with phase changes in wave optics
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of thin film interference in detail
  • Learn about the refractive indices of different materials
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of interference conditions
  • Investigate applications of thin film interference in optical devices
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists, and engineers working with optical coatings or devices that utilize thin film interference principles.

lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A blue (##\lambda=450nm##) beam of light hits a glass plate with ##n_g=1.5##. Calculate the minimum thickness that a plate with refractive index ##n_F=1.33##, that must be placed between the air and the glass to produce the maximum intensity reflected in the blue, should have. How much would this thickness have to be if the light was coming from the glass towards the air?
Relevant Equations
##\lambda_{medium}=\frac{\lambda}{n_{medium}}##
I know that every time that light goes from traveling through a medium with lower refractive index to one with a higher refractive index the reflected light undergoes a ##\frac{\lambda}{2}## phase change. Since this happens both at the air-plate and plate-glass interfaces we have that the phase changes cancel each other out and the condition for constructive interference is (where ##t## denotes the thickness of the plate): ##2t=m \lambda_{plate}\Leftrightarrow 2t=m\frac{\lambda}{n_F}\Leftrightarrow t=\frac{m\lambda}{2n_F}## so the minimum (non-zero) thickness is ##t=\frac{\lambda}{2n_F}.##

In the second scenario the situation is reversed and there is no ##\frac{\lambda}{2}## phase change for both the glass-plate interface and the plate-air interface and so the condition for constructive interference again reads ##2t=m \lambda_{plate}## and we get the same result as before.

Is this correct? I still have to fully grasp this phenomenon and I would like to have feedback on the way I have reasoned about this problem, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0 and Charles Link
kuruman said:
Your reasoning is correct.
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
899
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K