A problem with integration of modified Bessel function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a modified Bessel function within an exponential function, specifically the integral: \int {exp(-aX^2)I_0(b\sqrt(cX^2+dX+e))}dX. Participants explore various methods to approach this integral, including series expansions and numerical approximations, while expressing challenges in obtaining a closed-form solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using the series expansion of the modified Bessel function I_0(z) to rewrite the integral as a sum of polynomial terms, suggesting that if the order of integration and summation can be switched, it may lead to a solvable form.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty in obtaining a closed-form expression for the polynomial P_k(x) derived from the series expansion, indicating that the complexity of the terms complicates the integration process.
  • A different approach is suggested involving the integration of terms of the form e^{-ax^2} x^n, with a formula presented for integrating these terms, although the correctness of this approach is questioned.
  • Participants discuss the implications of integrating over the entire real line and provide specific formulas for integrating even and odd powers of x multiplied by the exponential function.
  • One participant shares results from numerical tests in Mathematica, noting that the numerical results appear to converge closely for certain values of the parameters involved.
  • Another participant introduces known integrals involving Bessel functions and exponential terms, questioning how these might relate to the original integral in question.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a method to solve the integral, with multiple competing approaches and ongoing uncertainty about the validity of proposed methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding a definitive solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the coefficients in the integral are functions of another variable, which adds complexity to the integration process. There are also references to the need for numerical integration or curve fitting to approximate solutions.

mozam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

In my work, I have to solve the following integral: \int {exp(-aX^2)I_0(b\sqrt(cX^2+dX+e))}dX
where I_0() is the modified Bessel function. I did not find the solution in any table of integral.

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How about a formal approach you probably won't like:

Let:

I_0(z)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\left(1/4 z^2\right)^k}{\left(k!)\right)^2}

then you could re-write the integral as:

\int e^{-ax^2}I_0(b\sqrt{cx^2+dx+e})dx=\int e^{-ax^2}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\left(1/4 b^2(cx^2+dx+e\right)^k}{\left(k!\right)^2}dx

so that ends up being polynomial terms in that sum so if it is legitimate to switch the order of integration and summation, I could re-write it as:

\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \int e^{-ax^2} P_k(x) dx

Some parts of those terms can be integrated directly I assume while others I would think, have to be expressed in terms of the expintegral. Still though, would be interesting if say five or ten terms of that sum gives decent results for some range of integration but I suppose the rate of convergence would be heavily dependent on the size of a.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Jackmell for your reply.

I tried the way you suggested, but it is quite difficult to have a closed form expression of the integral. The expression of P(x) that I obtain is:
<br /> P_{k}(x)=\frac{\left(b^2(cx^2+dx+e\right)^k}{4\left(k!\right)^2} = \frac{(b^{2k})}{4\left(k!\right)^2}\left(cx^2+dx+e\right)^k<br />
with \left(cx^2+dx+e\right)^k = \sum_{i=0}^{k} \sum_{j=0}^{k-i}\dbinom{k}{i}\dbinom{k-i}{j}e^{k-i-j}d^{j}c^{i}x^{2i+j}.

I still don't see how to approximate this integral.
 
Ok, didn't think to expand it in a double sum. Now, let me suggest something I'm not sure of but figuring if it's ok is part of the fun of doing math. So we have terms of the form:

e^{-ax^2} x^n

now:

\int e^{-ax^2}x^n dx=-1/2 x^{1+n} (ax^2)^{1/2(-1-n)} \Gamma\left(\frac{1+n}{2},ax^2\right)

Then can we not say:

<br /> \int e^{-ax^2}I_0(b\sqrt{cx^2+dx+e})dx<br />
<br /> =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{b^{2k}}{4(k!)^2}\sum_{i=0}^{k}\sum_{j=0}^{k-i}\binom{k}{i}\binom{k-i}{j}e^{k-i-j}d^j c^i \left\{-1/2 x^{1+n}(ax^2)^{1/2(-1-n)}\Gamma\left(\frac{1+n}{2},ax^2\right)\right\},\quad n=2i+j<br />

Now, I'm not saying that's right. I'm just asking is it or is it close and I just made some minor errors? Tell you what, if it was mine, you can bet I'd be plugging that into Mathematica to see if that's "appears" to be converging to numerical results in some reasonable interval for reasonable values of the constants.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, one more precision:
<br /> -\infty &lt; x &lt; \infty<br />
So that,
<br /> \sum_{j=0}^{k-i}(...)\int e^{-ax^2}x^{2i+j} dx = \sum_{p=0}^{k-i}(...)\{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-ax^2}x^{2(i+p)} dx + \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-ax^2}x^{2(i+p)+1} dx\}<br />
given that j is either odd or even,i.e., j=2p or j=2p+1.
Also,
<br /> \int_0^\infty{x^{2(i+p)} e^{-a x^2}\,dx} = \frac{(2(i+p))!}{(i+p)! 2^{2(i+p)+1}} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a^{2(i+p)+1}}}<br />
And
<br /> \int_0^\infty{x^{2(i+p)+1} e^{-a x^2}\,dx} = \frac{(i+p)!}{2 a^{i+p+1}}<br />
But the expression obtained does not help me so much because another thing is that the coefficients (except a and b) are function of another variable y. let say for instance c(y), d(y) and e(y). That's why I expect an expression of the integral so that I can later integrate with respect to y.

Thank you for any suggestion
 
Ok. But just for the record, that formula I gave above should read:

\int e^{-ax^2}I_0(b\sqrt{cx^2+dx+e})dx
=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{b^{2k}}{4^k(k!)^2}\sum_{i= 0}^{k}\sum_{j=0}^{k-i}\binom{k}{i}\binom{k-i}{j}e^{k-i-j}d^j c^i \left\{-1/2 x^{1+n}(ax^2)^{1/2(-1-n)}\Gamma\left(\frac{1+n}{2},ax^2\right)\right\},\quad n=2i+j

And I tested it in Mathematica using the first 15 terms cus' well I like math too:

Code:
In[218]:=
myf[a_, b_, c_, d_, e_, x_] := Exp[(-a)*x^2]*
    BesselI[0, b*Sqrt[c*x^2 + d*x + e]]; 
a = 1; 
b = 2; 
c = 3; 
d = 4; 
e = 5; 
x = 10; 
high = N[Sum[(b^(2*k)/(4^k*k!^2))*
      Sum[Binomial[k, i]*Binomial[k - i, j]*e^(k - i - j)*d^j*
        c^i*((-2^(-1))*x^(1 + 2*i + j)*(a*x^2)^
          ((1/2)*(-1 - 2*i - j))*Gamma[(1 + 2*i + j)/2, 
          a*x^2]), {i, 0, k}, {j, 0, k - i}], {k, 0, 15}]]; 
x = 1; 
low = N[Sum[(b^(2*k)/(4^k*k!^2))*
      Sum[Binomial[k, i]*Binomial[k - i, j]*e^(k - i - j)*d^j*
        c^i*((-2^(-1))*x^(1 + 2*i + j)*(a*x^2)^
          ((1/2)*(-1 - 2*i - j))*Gamma[(1 + 2*i + j)/2, 
          a*x^2]), {i, 0, k}, {j, 0, k - i}], {k, 0, 15}]]; 
N[high - low]
mynum = NIntegrate[myf[a, b, c, d, e, v], {v, 1, 10}]

Out[228]= 92.2159

Out[229]= 92.216

Which surprised me that it's so close.

Also Mozam, in your particular case, you may have to just integrate it numerically or at least do so numerically for a range then do a curve fit of the data to approximate the symbolic solution.
 
I see what you mean. Lot of work in perspective...

Another idea that I had is the use of classical integration methods and some known integrals like:

<br /> \int_0^{\infty} e^{-ax}J_0(b\sqrt{cx^2+2dx})dx=\frac{1}{\sqrt(a^2+b^2)}exp\left[d\left(a-\sqrt(a^2+b^2)\right)\right]<br />

or

<br /> \int_0^{\infty} e^{-ax^2}I_{\nu}(bx})dx=\frac{\pi}{2\sqrt(a)}exp\left(\frac{b^2}{8a}\right)I_{\frac{1}{2}\nu}\left(\frac{b^2}{8a}\right)<br />

But how to do that?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
932
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K