MHB A proof about the fibonnaci numbers (simple for you guys)

  • Thread starter Thread starter E01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Proof
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation $$F_1*F_2+F_2*F_3+...+F_{2n-1}*F_{2n}=F^2_{2n}$$ using induction. It was clarified that the earlier proof regarding $$F_{2n}=F_1+F_2+...+F_{2n-1}$$ is not necessary for this proof, despite being incorrectly stated. The correct approach involves assuming the result holds for n and proving it for n + 1, leading to the equation $$F_1F_2 + F_2F_3 + \cdots + F_{2n-1}F_{2n} + F_{2n}F_{2n+1} + F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2} = F_{2n+2}^2$$. The participant realized that simply substituting n + 1 into the equation was not sufficient for proving the sum. Ultimately, the guidance provided helped resolve the initial confusion and led to solving additional problems.
E01
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The problem is as stated:
Prove that $$F_1*F_2+F_2*F_3+...+F_{2n-1}*F_{2n}=F^2_{2n}$$

But earlier in my text I proved by induction that $$F_{2n}=F_1+F_2+...+F_{2n-1}$$. Do I need to use this earlier proof in my current proof. I tried adding $$F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2}$$ to the right and left hand side of the first equation and tried to find $$F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2}+F^2_{2n}=F^2_{2n+2}$$ but that doesn't seem to be going anywhere. (Why doesn't that seem to work in this case? Because I am multiplying two sums together?)

Am I wrong in assuming that I am supposed to prove this by induction?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your equation $$F_{2n}=F_1+F_2+...+F_{2n-1}$$ must have a typo, because it's incorrect (try it for [math] n = 2[/math], say). However, I don't think you need it to solve the given problem. Proving by induction is correct, but your induction step isn't set up quite right. Assume the result is true for n and try to prove it for n + 1. Thus, we are trying to prove that

[math]F_1F_2 + F_2F_3 + \cdots + F_{2n-1}F_{2n} + F_{2n}F_{2n+1} + F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2} = F_{2n+2}^2[/math]

(because [math]2(n+1) = 2n +2[/math]), and we know by induction that

[math]F_1F_2 + F_2F_3 + \cdots + F_{2n-1}F_{2n} = F_{2n}^2[/math]

Can you take it from there?
 
Yea, after you told me how to set it up it took about ten seconds :P, and here I had sat and wondered about it for like an hour. I had assumed that I could plug N+1 into $$F_{2n-1}F_{2n}$$ and add that back to the left hand side of the equation and get what equaled $$F^2_{2n+2}$$. So now I know that adding the last term with n+1 substituted for n to the sum doesn't necessarily result in the actual n+1 sum as a whole. (Also thanks to you I solved the next three problems I couldn't solve :D)
 
Last edited:
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K