MHB A proof about the fibonnaci numbers (simple for you guys)

  • Thread starter Thread starter E01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Proof
E01
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The problem is as stated:
Prove that $$F_1*F_2+F_2*F_3+...+F_{2n-1}*F_{2n}=F^2_{2n}$$

But earlier in my text I proved by induction that $$F_{2n}=F_1+F_2+...+F_{2n-1}$$. Do I need to use this earlier proof in my current proof. I tried adding $$F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2}$$ to the right and left hand side of the first equation and tried to find $$F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2}+F^2_{2n}=F^2_{2n+2}$$ but that doesn't seem to be going anywhere. (Why doesn't that seem to work in this case? Because I am multiplying two sums together?)

Am I wrong in assuming that I am supposed to prove this by induction?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your equation $$F_{2n}=F_1+F_2+...+F_{2n-1}$$ must have a typo, because it's incorrect (try it for [math] n = 2[/math], say). However, I don't think you need it to solve the given problem. Proving by induction is correct, but your induction step isn't set up quite right. Assume the result is true for n and try to prove it for n + 1. Thus, we are trying to prove that

[math]F_1F_2 + F_2F_3 + \cdots + F_{2n-1}F_{2n} + F_{2n}F_{2n+1} + F_{2n+1}F_{2n+2} = F_{2n+2}^2[/math]

(because [math]2(n+1) = 2n +2[/math]), and we know by induction that

[math]F_1F_2 + F_2F_3 + \cdots + F_{2n-1}F_{2n} = F_{2n}^2[/math]

Can you take it from there?
 
Yea, after you told me how to set it up it took about ten seconds :P, and here I had sat and wondered about it for like an hour. I had assumed that I could plug N+1 into $$F_{2n-1}F_{2n}$$ and add that back to the left hand side of the equation and get what equaled $$F^2_{2n+2}$$. So now I know that adding the last term with n+1 substituted for n to the sum doesn't necessarily result in the actual n+1 sum as a whole. (Also thanks to you I solved the next three problems I couldn't solve :D)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top