A question about invariant factors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factors Invariant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theorem stating that if R is a Principal Ideal Domain (PID), every finitely generated torsion R-module M can be expressed as a direct sum of cyclic modules. Specifically, M can be represented as M = R/(c_1) ⊕ R/(c_2) ⊕ ... ⊕ R/(c_t), where t ≥ 1 and c_1 | c_2 | ... | c_t. The participants explore methods for determining invariant factors without prior knowledge of elementary divisors, emphasizing the importance of having a presentation of the finitely generated module as a quotient of free modules, which is represented by a matrix that needs to be diagonalized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Principal Ideal Domains (PID)
  • Familiarity with finitely generated modules
  • Knowledge of elementary divisors and invariant factors
  • Matrix diagonalization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of diagonalizing matrices in the context of module theory
  • Research the relationship between elementary divisors and invariant factors in detail
  • Explore examples of finitely generated torsion modules in various PIDs
  • Learn about presentations of modules and their implications in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying module theory, particularly those focusing on invariant factors and their applications in algebraic structures.

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
A Theorem in our textbook says...

If R is a PID, then every finitely generated torision R-module M is a direct sum of cyclic modules

M= R/(c_1) \bigoplus R/(c_2) \bigoplus ... \bigoplus R/(c_t)

where t \geq 1 and c_1 | c_2 | ... | c_t.

There is an example from our textbook that I attached...they find the invariant factors from the elementary divisors. But what if we had to find the invariant factors without being given the elementary divisors. How would we do that?

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • 644.jpg
    644.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 462
  • 645.jpg
    645.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 511
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
well you have to be given something. i have some examples in my book on my webpage.

to be "given" a f.g. module usually means to be given a "presentation" as a quotient of two free modules.

such a quotient is specified by a matrix. then you diagonalize that presentation matrix.

see the discussion here:

http://www.math.uga.edu/%7Eroy/845-1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
971
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
912
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
7K