A question about Transcendental numbers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
hi pals
assume that m is a Transcendental number.
as you know we have:
x-m=0 => x=m
x^2-m=0 => x=+ or - sqrt(m)
.
.
.
so there must not be even one Transcendental number.
because all complex and real numbers can be the zero(s) of the equations above.
where is the problem?
thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_number" is, by definition, not the zero of a polynomial with rational coefficients.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shyan said:
isn't 1 rational ?

The constant term of the polynomial, in you case m, is also considered a coefficient (of x^0).
 
Shyan said:
hi pals
assume that m is a Transcendental number.
as you know we have:
x-m=0 => x=m
x^2-m=0 => x=+ or - sqrt(m)
.
.
.
so there must not be even one Transcendental number.
because all complex and real numbers can be the zero(s) of the equations above.
where is the problem?
thanks
Do you understand the definition of "transcendental number"? A transcendental number is one that cannot be found as a solution to a polynomial equation with integer coefficients. Saying that "x= + or - sqrt{m}" says nothing about whether x satisfies a polynomial equation with integer coefficient.