A question regarding Special Relativity.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the implications of special relativity in the context of a rocket traveling at a constant speed of 0.9c while emitting photons. The time dilation factor, represented by gamma (γ), is calculated to be 2.29416 seconds, indicating the time difference between photon emissions as perceived by observers on Earth. The Relativistic Doppler Factor is introduced as a method to determine the time intervals for received photons, yielding a delay of 4.3589 seconds. The discussion concludes with a method for calculating the rocket's position during acceleration by integrating the measured speed from the Doppler Shift Periods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, including time dilation and proper time.
  • Familiarity with the Relativistic Doppler Effect and its mathematical formulation.
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations related to relativistic speeds.
  • Knowledge of photon behavior and light speed in a vacuum.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of time dilation in special relativity.
  • Explore the applications of the Relativistic Doppler Effect in astrophysics.
  • Learn about integrating functions to calculate position over time in physics.
  • Investigate the effects of acceleration on time perception in relativistic contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of high-speed travel on time and space, particularly in astrophysical scenarios.

JPBenowitz
Messages
144
Reaction score
2
Suppose there is a rocket that is traveling at a constant .9c starting at an initial position x1 and fires a photon every second to observers on earth. (Observers on Earth do not know the velocity of the rocket)

If 1s is the proper time \Delta\tau then the time passed on Earth between each photon being fired would be \gamma or 2.29416s. Then dependent on the initial position x1 the time between each measured photon on Earth would be the time for each photon to travel the distance d from each position x at every 2.29416s? From measuring the time between each photon that reaches Earth you could calculate the positions x2...xn. But you would only be able to know the positions of where the rocket was not where it is presently.

Assuming I understand the above, how would someone go about by calculating the positions if the rocket is accelerating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JPBenowitz said:
Suppose there is a rocket that is traveling at a constant .9c starting at an initial position x1 and fires a photon every second to observers on earth. (Observers on Earth do not know the velocity of the rocket)

If 1s is the proper time \Delta\tau then the time passed on Earth between each photon being fired would be \gamma or 2.29416s. Then dependent on the initial position x1 the time between each measured photon on Earth would be the time for each photon to travel the distance d from each position x at every 2.29416s? From measuring the time between each photon that reaches Earth you could calculate the positions x2...xn. But you would only be able to know the positions of where the rocket was not where it is presently.

Assuming I understand the above, how would someone go about by calculating the positions if the rocket is accelerating?

Wait a minute, if the rocket is accelerating then \Deltat and \Delta\tau would be changing but the observers on Earth wouldn't be able to determine the relativistic time because it would be an element of the time it takes the photon to travel to earth.
 
JPBenowitz said:
But you would only be able to know the positions of where the rocket was not where it is presently.
Yes. That is always true.
 
JPBenowitz said:
Suppose there is a rocket that is traveling at a constant .9c starting at an initial position x1 and fires a photon every second to observers on earth. (Observers on Earth do not know the velocity of the rocket)

If 1s is the proper time \Delta\tau then the time passed on Earth between each photon being fired would be \gamma or 2.29416s. Then dependent on the initial position x1 the time between each measured photon on Earth would be the time for each photon to travel the distance d from each position x at every 2.29416s? From measuring the time between each photon that reaches Earth you could calculate the positions x2...xn. But you would only be able to know the positions of where the rocket was not where it is presently.

Assuming I understand the above, how would someone go about by calculating the positions if the rocket is accelerating?
You are right, the time observed from Earth of the 1 photon per second coming from the rocket will take even longer than the 2.29416 seconds. It's easy to calculate using the Relativistic Doppler Factor which for comparing intervals for objects moving directly apart from each other is:

D = √[(1+β)/(1-β)]

For β = 0.9
D = √[(1+0.9)/(1-0.9)]
D = √[(1.9)/(0.1)]
D = √19
D = 4.3589

That means as long as the rocket travels at the constant speed of 0.9c away from Earth and continues to send out a photon every second, Earth will receive them every 4.3589 seconds.

Now with a little algebra, you can turn the above formula around to calculate β if you know D:

β = |(1 - D2) / (1 + D2)|

So let's see if this works:

D = 4.3589
β = |(1 - D2) / (1 + D2)|
β = |(1 - 4.35892) / (1 + 4.35892)|
β = |(1 - 19) / (1 + 19)|
β = |-18/20|
β = |-0.9|
β = 0.9

So now we know how to determine the delayed speed of the rocket as it accelerates. If we wanted to keep track of the change in position just by looking at the Doppler Shift Periods, we could integrate the calculated speed measured as each photon was received.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K