A question regarding the Power series method of solving the QHO

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Power series method to solve the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator (QHO) as outlined in Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics text. The Schrödinger equation is reformulated into a summation of coefficients from the power series expansion, leading to a recursion formula for the wave function coefficients. The necessity of setting odd or even coefficients to zero based on the chosen energy level (E) is clarified, emphasizing that selecting an even state requires the odd coefficients to vanish, and vice versa, to ensure convergence of the series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with power series and recursion relations
  • Knowledge of the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator (QHO) model
  • Basic concepts of wave functions and their physical significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Frobenius method for solving differential equations
  • Explore the derivation of wave functions for the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator
  • Investigate the properties of even and odd functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about convergence criteria for power series in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wave functions, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator and power series methods in solving differential equations.

klawlor419
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I am working through the Griffiths QM text and I am getting caught up on some the process he uses to derive the wave functions and energy levels for the QHO, via Frobenius/Power series method.

I understand that the Schrödinger equation get recast into a summation form over the coefficients of the power series expansion. I understand that each of the terms in the summation, which represents the original Schrödinger equation for the QHO, must be equal to zero. This is the replacement for the differential equation. Once this is realized the recursion formula for all of the coefficients of the wave function is produced.

Griffiths breaks this down into odd and even functions for the values of the index j. Discusses the divergence of the series, which was similar to asymptotic expansion he introduced at the beginning of the section. He then explains that the way to make the series convergent is by requiring the series to terminate at j=n. This imposes the condition on E that solves for the energy levels of the QHO.

What I am confused by is why, when I set n=0, I must set the first odd coefficient to zero. Does it have to due with the physicality of the wave function? On the same note, I am confused with larger values of n and this same sort of thing. Let's say that I choose the n=2 state, so that the series will be cutoff at n=2, if I choose the first odd-coefficient to be zero wouldn't I loose some portion of the wave function that could be important? How do we know that if n is even the odd terms must disappear and vice-versa?

I realize that the wave functions for the QHO should be alternatively odd and even functions. i am missing something. Thanks ahead of time for whatever help is offered.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get a recursion formula that relates coefficients cm and cm+2, which means it connects all the odd powers to each other, and all the even powers to each other. The first two coefficients c0 and c1 are completely arbitrary. So schematically you get a solution

y = c0 x (..even power series..) + c1 x (..odd power series..)

Now pick a value of E that makes the even power series terminate. However with this value, the odd power series does NOT terminate, so you must set c1 = 0.

Or... you can pick a value of E that makes the odd power series terminate. Then the even series will not terminate and you must set c0 = 0.
 
OK I understand now. I was almost there in my understanding but slightly missing something. Thanks for the help!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K