A serious question about CPU/GPU bottlenecks.

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential CPU bottleneck when pairing a Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition @ 3.4 GHz with a Radeon HD 5870 GPU. It is established that the Core i7 @ 4.5 GHz is the only CPU that can avoid bottlenecking the Radeon HD 5xxx series. Users express concerns about the performance limitations of the Phenom II X4 965, particularly in demanding games like Crysis, and discuss the discontinuation of the first revision of the Sapphire HD 5870, noting that the second revision runs significantly hotter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of CPU and GPU performance dynamics
  • Familiarity with AMD Phenom II X4 architecture
  • Knowledge of Radeon HD 5xxx series specifications
  • Basic understanding of gaming performance metrics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research CPU-GPU bottlenecking in gaming systems
  • Explore benchmarks for Phenom II X4 965 and Radeon HD 5870
  • Investigate cooling solutions for high-performance gaming rigs
  • Learn about the differences between GPU revisions, specifically the Sapphire HD 5870
USEFUL FOR

Gamers, PC builders, hardware enthusiasts, and anyone looking to optimize gaming performance with specific CPU and GPU combinations.

The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
At the end of this month, I am building a gaming desktop computer with the following specifications. I was told that the ONLY CPU capable of not having any bottleneck with the Radeon HD 5xxx series is a Core i7 @ 4.5 GHz. How badly will a Phenom II X4 965 BE @3.4 GHz bottleneck a single Radeon HD 5870? Will the ability of that GPU be severely limited limited by that bottleneck? Do I have to spend another $1,000 to buy a Core i7 rig with an X58 motherboard and water cooling after trying to get it to that ludicrous speed?

Off topic, I heard that the first revision of the Sapphire HD 5870 has been discontinued, but is there any way of getting a hold of One anymore? The 2nd revision runs about 20 *C hotter both idle and load, due to cheaper circuitry than the 1st revision.

If you can't get the 1st revision anymore, it's a damn shame. Sapphire should be ashamed of themselves.

Also, what is the maximum theoretical graphical settings I could play Crysis on and still get a playable frame rate?

* Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition
* ASUS Crosshair III Formula AM3 socket motherboard.
* 4GB of 1333 or 1600 MHz DDR3 RAM
* Sapphire Radeon HD 5870 Vapor-X
* 850W or greater PSU
* CoolerMaster HAF 932 full tower case
* DVD-RW ROM
* 1TB 7200 RPM HDD
* Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I'd have a read of this article:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/balanced-gaming-pc,review-31741.html?xtmc=balanced_pc&xtcr=1
In general, most games are GPU limited once you have a fairly decent processor (eg. i5 750, phenom 965). The i7 often performs no better than these ones since it's set up to run 8 threads but most games aren't that well threaded. That build looks pretty good, I'd look through some of the benchmarks/reviews on tomshardware to get an idea of what it's capable of doing... should definitely play crysis at most resolutions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K