A silly question about equations....

  • Thread starter Thread starter ViolentCorpse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the mathematical representation of equal but opposite force vectors, specifically in the context of Newton's laws and Kirchhoff's voltage law. The correct expression for two equal and opposite vectors A and B is A = -B, indicating that while their magnitudes are equal, their directions are opposite. The confusion arises from misinterpreting the relationship between magnitudes and vector directions. The algebraic sum of forces, represented as A + B = 0, confirms that the vector sum results in a zero vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics and notation
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of Kirchhoff's voltage law (KVL)
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector addition and subtraction in physics
  • Learn more about Newton's laws and their applications in mechanics
  • Explore Kirchhoff's laws in electrical circuit analysis
  • Investigate the concept of the zero vector and its implications in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of vector relationships and circuit analysis principles.

ViolentCorpse
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I'm not sure if this belongs in the Maths section, so I'm sorry if I've made a mistake.

I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of the most basic sorts of equations.
For example, if we have two exactly equal but opposite force vectors A and B acting on a body, then by Newton's law the algebraic sum of these forces must equal zero. If you ask me to write these words in maths, I would write it like this:
A - B = 0,
which implies that
A=B

But that goes against my intuition. I mean to say that, if you ask me to immediately express the relationship between two vectors that are equal yet opposite, in mathematical form, I would write it like this:

A= -B

I'm confused which one of these equations expresses the relationship correctly. Please help me understand what is the correct way of expressing this mathematically, and why.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ViolentCorpse said:
Hi,

I'm not sure if this belongs in the Maths section, so I'm sorry if I've made a mistake.

I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of the most basic sorts of equations.
For example, if we have two exactly equal but opposite force vectors A and B acting on a body, then by Newton's law the algebraic sum of these forces must equal zero. If you ask me to write these words in maths, I would write it like this:
A - B = 0,
which implies that
A=B

But that goes against my intuition. I mean to say that, if you ask me to immediately express the relationship between two vectors that are equal yet opposite, in mathematical form, I would write it like this:

A= -B

I'm confused which one of these equations expresses the relationship correctly. Please help me understand what is the correct way of expressing this mathematically, and why.

Thank you!

The sum of the forces is equal to zero implies A + B = 0, not A - B = 0.

A and B would be force vectors, which have magnitude and direction. If A and B are equal and opposite, their magnitudes will be the same, and their directions will be opposite. Make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
ViolentCorpse said:
A=B
That the equation for the magnitudes.

ViolentCorpse said:
A= -B
That the equation for the vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
ViolentCorpse said:
For example, if we have two exactly equal but opposite force vectors A and B acting on a body, then by Newton's law the algebraic sum of these forces must equal zero.
They can't be "exactly equal" if their directions are different. As already pointed out, their magnitudes can be equal even though the vectors themselves are different (and therefore unequal).
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
A.T. said:
That the equation for the magnitudes.
But I found that equation out using Newton's law, which I think handles vectors?

The same problem has confused me in circuit analysis when applying kirchhoffs voltage law. Suppose we have a battery of volts Vi connected to a resistor whose voltage is Vo. By KVL, the equation would be

Vi-Vo=0
Vi=Vo

Although Vi and Vo have opposite polarities. Again, I think Vi= -Vo, would be the correct expression of the relationship. Is the KVL equation only about magnitudes like Newton's?
 
ViolentCorpse said:
But I found that equation out using Newton's law, which I think handles vectors?
Sure, but you're misunderstanding what the vectors represent. If they are oppositely directed, with equal magnitudes, then their vector sum will be the zero vector. For example, suppose ##\vec{A}## = <1,1> and ##\vec{B}## = <-1, -1>. The first vector points in the NE direction, and the second points in the SW direction, so their directions are directly opposite one another. Both vectors have magnitudes of ##\sqrt{2}##.

##\vec{A} + \vec{B}## = <1, 1> + <-1, -1> = <0, 0>.
ViolentCorpse said:
The same problem has confused me in circuit analysis when applying kirchhoffs voltage law. Suppose we have a battery of volts Vi connected to a resistor whose voltage is Vo. By KVL, the equation would be

Vi-Vo=0
Vi=Vo

Although Vi and Vo have opposite polarities. Again, I think Vi= -Vo, would be the correct expression of the relationship. Is the KVL equation only about magnitudes like Newton's?
The business about the opposite polarities is where the signs come in. If you take the voltage potential across the battery to be positive, then the voltage drop across the resistor should be treated as negative. Assuming Vi = 6V, then V0 would be -6V. The equation is Vi + V0 = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
So basically, I'm making the mistake of changing the sign + to - during the addition of symbols that represent the quantity, without plugging in the quantity first, right?

Thanks a lot guys! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
552
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
981