A silly question about equations....

  • Thread starter Thread starter ViolentCorpse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the correct mathematical representation of equal but opposite force vectors and their implications in physics. The confusion arises between two equations: A - B = 0, which implies A = B, and A = -B, which accurately reflects their opposite directions. It is clarified that while magnitudes can be equal, the vectors themselves are not equal due to their opposing directions. The same principle applies in circuit analysis, where the relationship between voltages must account for polarity, leading to equations like Vi + Vo = 0. Ultimately, the key takeaway is recognizing that signs in equations reflect the directionality of vectors and voltages.
ViolentCorpse
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I'm not sure if this belongs in the Maths section, so I'm sorry if I've made a mistake.

I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of the most basic sorts of equations.
For example, if we have two exactly equal but opposite force vectors A and B acting on a body, then by Newton's law the algebraic sum of these forces must equal zero. If you ask me to write these words in maths, I would write it like this:
A - B = 0,
which implies that
A=B

But that goes against my intuition. I mean to say that, if you ask me to immediately express the relationship between two vectors that are equal yet opposite, in mathematical form, I would write it like this:

A= -B

I'm confused which one of these equations expresses the relationship correctly. Please help me understand what is the correct way of expressing this mathematically, and why.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ViolentCorpse said:
Hi,

I'm not sure if this belongs in the Maths section, so I'm sorry if I've made a mistake.

I'm having trouble understanding the meaning of the most basic sorts of equations.
For example, if we have two exactly equal but opposite force vectors A and B acting on a body, then by Newton's law the algebraic sum of these forces must equal zero. If you ask me to write these words in maths, I would write it like this:
A - B = 0,
which implies that
A=B

But that goes against my intuition. I mean to say that, if you ask me to immediately express the relationship between two vectors that are equal yet opposite, in mathematical form, I would write it like this:

A= -B

I'm confused which one of these equations expresses the relationship correctly. Please help me understand what is the correct way of expressing this mathematically, and why.

Thank you!

The sum of the forces is equal to zero implies A + B = 0, not A - B = 0.

A and B would be force vectors, which have magnitude and direction. If A and B are equal and opposite, their magnitudes will be the same, and their directions will be opposite. Make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
ViolentCorpse said:
A=B
That the equation for the magnitudes.

ViolentCorpse said:
A= -B
That the equation for the vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
ViolentCorpse said:
For example, if we have two exactly equal but opposite force vectors A and B acting on a body, then by Newton's law the algebraic sum of these forces must equal zero.
They can't be "exactly equal" if their directions are different. As already pointed out, their magnitudes can be equal even though the vectors themselves are different (and therefore unequal).
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
A.T. said:
That the equation for the magnitudes.
But I found that equation out using Newton's law, which I think handles vectors?

The same problem has confused me in circuit analysis when applying kirchhoffs voltage law. Suppose we have a battery of volts Vi connected to a resistor whose voltage is Vo. By KVL, the equation would be

Vi-Vo=0
Vi=Vo

Although Vi and Vo have opposite polarities. Again, I think Vi= -Vo, would be the correct expression of the relationship. Is the KVL equation only about magnitudes like Newton's?
 
ViolentCorpse said:
But I found that equation out using Newton's law, which I think handles vectors?
Sure, but you're misunderstanding what the vectors represent. If they are oppositely directed, with equal magnitudes, then their vector sum will be the zero vector. For example, suppose ##\vec{A}## = <1,1> and ##\vec{B}## = <-1, -1>. The first vector points in the NE direction, and the second points in the SW direction, so their directions are directly opposite one another. Both vectors have magnitudes of ##\sqrt{2}##.

##\vec{A} + \vec{B}## = <1, 1> + <-1, -1> = <0, 0>.
ViolentCorpse said:
The same problem has confused me in circuit analysis when applying kirchhoffs voltage law. Suppose we have a battery of volts Vi connected to a resistor whose voltage is Vo. By KVL, the equation would be

Vi-Vo=0
Vi=Vo

Although Vi and Vo have opposite polarities. Again, I think Vi= -Vo, would be the correct expression of the relationship. Is the KVL equation only about magnitudes like Newton's?
The business about the opposite polarities is where the signs come in. If you take the voltage potential across the battery to be positive, then the voltage drop across the resistor should be treated as negative. Assuming Vi = 6V, then V0 would be -6V. The equation is Vi + V0 = 0.
 
  • Like
Likes ViolentCorpse
So basically, I'm making the mistake of changing the sign + to - during the addition of symbols that represent the quantity, without plugging in the quantity first, right?

Thanks a lot guys! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
7K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
437
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
864