A Simple Linear Algebra Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on why the rows of a 4x2 matrix A must be linearly dependent. It is established that since the rank of the matrix can only be 0, 1, or 2, and there are four vectors in a two-dimensional space, at most two can be independent. This leads to the conclusion that the remaining rows must be dependent. The conversation also touches on the equivalence of row and column rank, emphasizing that the row rank, being at most 2, confirms the linear dependence of the four rows. Overall, the explanation aligns with the principles of linear algebra regarding dimensions and vector independence.
maherelharake
Messages
261
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If A is a 4x2 matrix, explain why the rows of A must be linearly dependent.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I put...
Since the rank of the matrix is either 0, 1, or 2, I can conclude that the nullility is either 2, 1, or 0. So since there are 4 vectors in a 2 dimensional space, at most two are independent. Therefore the other rows must be dependent. '
Is this anywhere close? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've said is correct, although the last two sentences are what you really want. R2 is 2-dimensional, so any 4 vectors must have dependencies. Of course, however, just from the question itself we can't tell what your professor would expect you to use; that would depend on what he's teaching in class.
 
So I don't have to add anything else to that? It makes sense, but it seems like that is more of a Chapter 2 explanation (we are in Chapter 5), and I was trying to explain it in a way that deals with our current material. Thanks
 
In the subject there would be theorems proved that say something to the effect that any set of n+1 vectors in an n dimensional vector space are never linearly independent. These considerations come up when you prove that every basis of a finite dimensional vector space has the same number of vectors; this number is defined to be the dimension. If you've covered this, then I don't see why you can't use the fact that R2 is 2-dimensional.

On the other hand, with the current material, you might say that the column and row rank of a matrix are equivalent (which is what you hinted at), and that the row rank can be at most 2. By definition, row rank is the dimension of the rowspace; if it is less than or equal to 2, then 4 vectors certainly cannot be linearly independent. Essentially, these two arguments are almost equivalent, and they both rely on the concept of a unique dimension. I personally don't know another way to do this problem.
 
Ok thanks a lot. I will keep what I had, but add a little more explanation.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K