A thought on plumbing, water wasted

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of reducing water waste in plumbing systems, particularly in relation to waiting for hot water in faucets and showers. Participants explore various ideas, including mechanical solutions and the reuse of grey water, while considering the practicality and efficiency of these approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a valve above the tank to redirect water back into a reservoir, proposing a mechanical solution to save water.
  • Another participant agrees that such systems are common in apartment buildings but notes the necessity of a pump, which may negate water savings in houses due to energy losses.
  • A different viewpoint mentions the idea of reusing grey water from baths and showers, but expresses concerns about storage limitations without treatment.
  • Some participants discuss the existing systems that require electricity and compare them to the proposed mechanical solution, highlighting the need for pressure differences in plumbing systems.
  • One participant clarifies that domestic water systems are pressurized, making it impractical to simply release water back into the tank without a pump.
  • Another participant shares their experience with a specific system that includes a third pipe to return pre-runoff water to the tank, suggesting it could be effective.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of warm water in cold water pipes and the efficiency of point-of-use heaters as alternatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the feasibility and efficiency of proposed solutions. While some ideas are acknowledged as existing practices, there is no consensus on the best approach to minimize water waste.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to pressure dynamics in plumbing systems and the potential energy losses associated with pumps. The discussion also reflects varying opinions on the practicality of grey water reuse and the efficiency of different heating systems.

Newai
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Waiting for the water to warm up means letting the shower/sink faucet run for a while, especially in this apartment building. So, how about a valve just above the tank that sends that water in the line back into a reservoir, which can be released back into the tank?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Good idea.
 
That's typically done in apartment buildings - it kinda has to be since otherwise it would take forever to get hot water. It requires a pump though, and for houses the energy loss of the pump and heat loss in the pipes that are always hot would cancel out the $$ saved in water.
 
This is a good idea.
People always talk about reusing grey water from baths and showers. I always thought it would be a good idea to channel it to a water butt outside of my house. When I did some research I found that the water could only be stored for about a day without treating it so I don't think it is such a good idea after all.
 
russ_watters said:
That's typically done in apartment buildings - it kinda has to be since otherwise it would take forever to get hot water. It requires a pump though, and for houses the energy loss of the pump and heat loss in the pipes that are always hot would cancel out the $$ saved in water.

A pump for what? I mean using a valve right above the tank to release the water already in the line from the tank to the faucet/shower head back into a reservoir that could return the water back into the tank.
 
Last edited:
Chi Meson said:
It already exists.

I'm coming back with a link...

Here it is:

http://www.gothotwater.com/

But that's a pump that requires electricity. My suggestion is strictly mechanical/nonelectrical.
 
lincs-b said:
This is a good idea.
People always talk about reusing grey water from baths and showers. I always thought it would be a good idea to channel it to a water butt outside of my house. When I did some research I found that the water could only be stored for about a day without treating it so I don't think it is such a good idea after all.

I thought that was water intended for the toilet. Given how often most places will have the toilet used, you shouldn't need to store it for more than a day.
 
Newai said:
But that's a pump that requires electricity. My suggestion is strictly mechanical/nonelectrical.
Well, that's simply not going to work. The water in the tank is about 60 psi greater than atmospheric pressure. That's the reason it comes out when you open the faucet. A difference in pressure is needed to cause water to flow. If you let the faucet run until the water got hot, then that water is now at ATM, and it can't funnel back into the tank without be pressurized.

I can't tell if this is the system I heard of before, but the real water to save is the hot water that is in your pipes after you turn off the faucet. At this point the pump pushes that hot water back into the tank. Since this hot water is pushed by the equally pressured cold water, very little force/energy is needed to do this pumping.

Much more energy is saved by not letting that heat leak into your house walls, compare to the energy used by the pump.
 
  • #10
Hmm. Okay, thanks for clearing that up.
 
  • #11
Newai said:
A pump for what? I mean using a valve right above the tank to release the water already in the line from the tank to the faucet/shower head back into a reservoir that could return the water back into the tank.
Domestic water systems don't have air in them so you can't just "release" the water and let it fall. The entire system is always pressurized, otherwise water wouldn't flow up the pipes in the first place.
 
  • #12
Chi Meson said:
It already exists.

I'm coming back with a link...

Here it is:

http://www.gothotwater.com/
The downside of not having a dedicated return is that now your cold water pipes contain warm water.
 
  • #13
Newai said:
I thought that was water intended for the toilet. Given how often most places will have the toilet used, you shouldn't need to store it for more than a day.

It can be used for gardening as well, my idea was for it to collect in a rain butt type container out side of the house. There would be no need for a pump then.
So much water gets wasted by burst pipes any idea would have to save a household money rather than being concerned with saving a small amount of water.
 
  • #14
russ_watters said:
The downside of not having a dedicated return is that now your cold water pipes contain warm water.

The original system that I heard of about 2 years ago did have a 3rd pipe to allow the "pre-runoff" to go back to the tank. When the temp reached about 5 degrees of the expected "hot" temp, the water would flow from the faucet, and when the faucet was turned off, cold water pushed the hot back to the tank.

I considered installing this system, but I already have a rather efficient short-run to most of my taps, and I installed a 4-gallon "point-of-use" mini-tank in my kitchen.

In general, I highly recommend the POU heaters, both tankless and minitank, for your far-reaching faucets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
817
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
21
Views
9K