A traffic accident with Newton's first law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a traffic accident scenario involving a pickup truck and a Jaguar sedan, analyzed through the lens of Newton's first law of motion. Key conclusions include that the Jaguar could have collided with the pickup, and the motion of the straw bales was influenced by external forces, confirming that they would spill out if the truck was hit. The analysis asserts that there is sufficient information to determine fault based on the circumstances described, contradicting the claim that fault cannot be established.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's first law of motion
  • Basic principles of physics related to motion and forces
  • Familiarity with accident analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of how to conduct physical experiments to demonstrate motion concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Newton's laws of motion in detail
  • Research accident reconstruction methods
  • Learn about the physics of collisions and their effects on objects
  • Investigate the principles of inertia and its applications in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, accident reconstruction professionals, and anyone interested in understanding the application of Newton's laws in real-life situations.

lim
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider this situation: A police officer arrives at the scene of an accident and finds a load of straw bales partly on the back of a pickup truck and partly on the hood of a Jaguar sedan. Both vehicles are facing in the same direction. The pickup is in front of the Jaguar. The truck driver claims that she was stopped at the stop sign when the Jag drove into the back of her truck. The Jaguar driver claims that he was stopped behind the pickup when the truck suddenly backed up. Given this information decide whether each statement is true or false.

-The Jaguar could have driven into the pickup.
-Regardless of fault, the apparent motion of the bales results from them seeking the natural state of rest.
I-f the vehicles were both moving (truck in reverse and car forward), the pickup must have been moving faster.
-These results are impossible. The bales would have fallen forward in this type of accident.
- The Jaguar must have driven into the pickup.
- There is not enough information to determine who is at fault.


2. applicable information:

An object at rest stays at rest, object in motion continues in motion unitl stopped by another net external force.






The Attempt at a Solution



1. true, if they were in the truck they would be pushed to the back and if it got hit, it would have spilled out.

2. true, it was acted on by forces which made it spill out.

3. True, the stop when hitting the Jaguar makes the straw fall out.

4. False, If it fell forward the truck would have to hit something in front on it.

5. true, If it hit it would cause them to spill out.

6. False, there is enough information, circumstance and evidence.


any help appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the second statement is meant to be an argument based on the theory of motion of Aristotle's. And as for number six, I don't think you determined who was at fault, nor can you.
 
Last edited:
Get two blocks. Books will do. Put something unstable on top the front book. Another book on edge will do. Slide the back one into the front one. Then slide the front one into the back one. Then bump them together. The answers will be obvious if you balance the unstable load so that it is free to fall onto the back book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K