A typical motion question (am I correct?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hadjiev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a helicopter rescuing a boy from a flooded street. The helicopter hovers at 20 m and accelerates upwards at 0.2 m/s² for 8 seconds before the cable snaps. The calculations reveal that the boy falls from a height of 6.4 m with an initial velocity of 1.6 m/s, resulting in a landing speed of 11.31 m/s, equivalent to 41 km/h. The participants confirm the accuracy of the calculations and highlight the importance of considering the upward motion before the fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Familiarity with acceleration and velocity concepts
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (9.8 m/s²)
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (e.g., m/s to km/h)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review kinematic equations, specifically v² = v₀² + 2ad
  • Study the effects of initial velocity on falling objects
  • Learn about the principles of motion under gravity
  • Explore real-world applications of physics in rescue operations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in applying kinematic equations to real-world scenarios.

Hadjiev
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey, I was wondering if someone could check my answer for this question:

A helicopter is rescuing a boy from a flooded street. Hovering 20 m in the air, a cable is lowered to the child. After it is attached, the helicopter begins to accelerate upwards at 0.2 m/s^2. Eight seconds later, the rope snaps and the child plunges to the ground. How fast (in km/h) was the child traveling when he landed?

Helicopter:

a = 0.2m/s^2
t = 8s
v1 = 0 (I figured since he is hovering)


Boy:
v1 =
d =
a = 9.8m/s^2

I started by calculating the overall distance the helicopter traveled; it came out to 6.4 m, which makes it 26.4 m in the air. The boy must then be 6.4 m off the ground, and thus his fall is a total of 6.4 m.

Then I calculated the final speed of the helicopter. I figured that the final speed of the helicopter should be the initial speed of the boy. This came out to 1.6m/s

At this point I have the distance of the boy's fall, his acceleration, and his initial velocity (it turned out to be negative, due to direction).

I subbed in acc, v1, and d into v2^2 = v1^2 + 2ad and got an answer of 11.31 m/s, which ends up being 41 km/h.

Is my logic correct? Thanks in advance,

Nicholas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is v1 in the equation - v2^2 = v1^2 + 2ad.

Your logic regarding the altitude of 6.4 m and the boys velocity 1.6 m/s is correct.

At the point the cable breaks, the boys begins to decelerate, from 1.6 m/s until he stops, V=0, at which point he achieves maximum altitude. Then the boy accelerates downward to the ground.
 
Ack! I forgot about the upward motion. Thanks Astronuc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K