B A universe where Zeno is right and the law of inertia still holds

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmadphy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Zeno's paradox argues that motion is impossible due to the need to complete infinitely many steps, a claim that Newtonian physics counters by assuming continuous space and time. The discussion explores the hypothetical scenario where Zeno's paradox holds true while still allowing for inertia, but concludes that such a universe is not conceivable. It is noted that fine-grained spacetime could resolve the paradox, similar to motion on a computer screen. The conversation also dismisses the idea that Zeno's paradox could explain quantum superposition, emphasizing that a false premise cannot provide valid explanations. Ultimately, the thread reaffirms the validity of motion despite Zeno's arguments.
ahmadphy
Zeno’s paradox suggests motion is impossible due to the need to complete infinitely many steps. In Newtonian physics, this is resolved by assuming space and time are continuous, and motion follows smoothly by inertia.
But is it conceivable to imagine a hypothetical universe where space and time are structured (e.g.in a nonstandard way ) such that Zeno’s paradox holds literally yet objects still obey a law of inertia in some consistent form?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
No.
 
ahmadphy said:
Zeno’s paradox suggests motion is impossible due to the need to complete infinitely many steps. In Newtonian physics, this is resolved by assuming space and time are continuous, and motion follows smoothly by inertia.
Assuming some sort of fine-grained spacetime would also resolve the paradox. That's what happens with motion simulated on a computer screen. In fact, that's a clearer solution to the paradox as there comes a point where the object moves from one cell to the next. And the motion cannot be further subdivided.
 
Maybe I shouldn't ask this here but:
If we could imagine a universe where Zeno's paradox is literally true but inertia still holds, could that maybe explain the quantum superposition?
 
ahmadphy said:
If we could imagine a universe where Zeno's paradox is literally true but inertia still holds, could that maybe explain the quantum superposition?
No.
The posts above have already established that Zeno's argument is bogus (Zeno himself, of course, knew that it was bogus because of course motion is possible) whether spacetime is continuous or discrete, so this question is like asking "If 2+2=5 could that maybe explain why water is wet?"... No, a false statement can't explain anything.

And even if the argument were valid, quantum superposition isn't what you're thinking it is. If you aren't up for taking on a first-year QM textbook (several good recommendations in the textbooks section here) yo might try Giancarlo Girardi's book "Sneaking a look at god's cards".
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
Closed pending moderation
 
After moderator review, the thread will remain closed.
 
Back
Top