A Weekend with Chris McKay: NASA Scientist

  • Context: NASA 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nasa Scientist
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a weekend event with NASA scientist Chris McKay, focusing on his research interests in astrobiology and planetary science, particularly regarding exoplanets and bodies within our solar system like Mars, Europa, and Titan. Participants express their excitement and curiosity, posing questions about atmospheric signatures indicative of biological activity and the implications of recent discoveries on Mars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses curiosity about atmospheric chemical signatures that could suggest biological activity on exoplanets, specifically asking about reactive compounds like free atmospheric oxygen.
  • Another participant shares their experience with Chris McKay, noting his approachable nature and suggesting questions about newly-discovered running water on Mars.
  • Discussion includes the vertical temperature distribution of hydrogen gas on Titan, which some participants suggest poses challenges for abiotic explanations.
  • Reactive compounds mentioned include free atmospheric oxygen, ozone, and methane as potential indicators of biological contributions.
  • Concerns are raised about the biological impact of various salts, particularly perchlorate salts found by the Phoenix lander, and their implications for understanding Martian water.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express enthusiasm and curiosity about the topics discussed, but there is no consensus on the specific implications of the findings or the best questions to ask Chris McKay. Multiple viewpoints on the significance of atmospheric signatures and the role of salts in biological processes remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge their varying levels of familiarity with the subject matter, which may influence the depth and specificity of their questions and contributions.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrobiology, planetary science, and the search for extraterrestrial life may find the discussion relevant, particularly those curious about the implications of atmospheric chemistry on exoplanets and solar system bodies.

Physics news on Phys.org


I have a bunch of questions since I'm not so familiar with this field. I'm jealous that you get to spend the weekend with him!
 


I don't know enough about the subject to come up with a good question lol.
 


OK, I 'll bite. What atmospheric chemical signatures might suggest something akin to biological activity on an exoplanet? In other words, What reactive compounds, such as free atmospheric oxygen, would be difficult to explain without replensishment by something resembling biological contributions?
 
Last edited:


I got to spend a few days with Chris McKay at Zzyzx in the Mojave Desert with the Spaceward Bound group twice in the last 3 years. You'll love him. He's very approachable. I remember somebody asked him how sunscreen works. Yep, he knows that too!

Ask him about the newly-discovered running water on Mars.
 


Okay - replies will come a bit slow since there isn't much free time on vacation. But I'll say these things

OK, I 'll bite. What atmospheric chemical signatures might suggest something akin to biological activity on an exoplanet? In other words, What reactive compounds, such as free atmospheric oxygen, would be difficult to explain without replensishment by something resembling biological contributions?

Ah - so he's more interested in Mars/Europa/Titan than he is about exoplanets (since he wants to directly determine whether or not exolife exists - which can really only happen with missions to these three bodies). That being said, he says that the vertical temperature distribution of hydrogen gas (H2) on Titan (far less of it at the surface than you would expect) is such that it's difficult to give an abiotic explanation of it (right now)

What reactive compounds, such as free atmospheric oxygen, would be difficult to explain without replensishment by something resembling biological contributions?

Free atmospheric oxygen, ozone (related to oxygen), methane (might be others)

I got to spend a few days with Chris McKay at Zzyzx in the Mojave Desert with the Spaceward Bound group twice in the last 3 years. You'll love him. He's very approachable. I remember somebody asked him how sunscreen works. Yep, he knows that too!

Hahaha nice. :) I wonder how he responded to how sunscreen works. He's really good at making deadpan jokes

==

As for the newly-discovered running water - I'll ask tomorrow. I do know that a lot of it may depend on the biological impact of salts other than sodium chloride (which we know next to nothing about right now). The Phoenix lander showed a huge overabundance of perchlorate salts at its landing site (which is what has become his new obsession), and he's trying to figure out the implications of that right now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K