Abaqus2 - Kinematic Coupling VS Rigids

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the differences between Kinematic Coupling in Abaqus and Rigids in Nastran. Kinematic Coupling ties the displacement of one node to another using functions like Tx2 = function(Tx1), allowing for various degrees of motion correlation. In contrast, rigid elements such as RBAR or RBE2 achieve similar displacement tracking by rigidly connecting parts. The discussion emphasizes avoiding RBE3 due to its potential to create inaccurate results, particularly in force distribution scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kinematic Coupling in Abaqus
  • Familiarity with rigid elements in Nastran, specifically RBAR and RBE2
  • Knowledge of finite element analysis principles
  • Awareness of displacement compatibility and force equilibrium concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of Kinematic Coupling in Abaqus
  • Study the characteristics and applications of RBAR and RBE2 in Nastran
  • Learn about the limitations and proper use cases for RBE3
  • Explore advanced functions for Kinematic Coupling to enhance modeling accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and analysts working with finite element analysis, particularly those utilizing Abaqus and Nastran for structural simulations and optimization.

harsunra
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between Kinematic coupling in Abaqus and Rigids in Nastran?
Why it is named as Kinematic Coupling... what is the physics behind the word kinematic and rigids?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My vague impression is, kinematic coupling ties the displacement (motion) of node 2 to node 1, using a function such as Tx2 = function(Tx1), where T means translation, and x means global x axis. In its simplest form, the above kinematic coupling function could be Tx2 = Tx1, which means node 2 follows exactly the displacement of node 1. Or, you could make the kinematic coupling more advanced, such as Tx2 = 0.5*Tx1.

Another way to achieve Tx2 = Tx1 is to use a rigid bar finite element, such as RBAR or RBE2. A rigid element rigidly welds the parts together.

Aside: Keep in mind, RBE3 is not a rigid element. RBE3 creates force equilibrium, but not displacement compatibility. Therefore, generally always avoid RBE3, except in very simple situations where you are sure you know what you are doing. E.g., perhaps (?) use RBE3 only if you want to distribute a force or mass from a node that has no other element connected to it, but you do not want a valid displacement compatibility between the parts. You can get very strange, grossly incorrect results using RBE3. E.g., let's say you want to distribute a force from the center of a bolt hole to the hole edge. Sounds fairly benign, doesn't it? Well, the stresses in the plate can be completely wrong garbage. I am unable to clearly explain RBE3, except to say, generally always avoid RBE3, whenever possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K