About bases of complex (Hilbert) space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of bases in complex (Hilbert) space, particularly in relation to the canonical basis of 3-dimensional real linear space. Participants explore whether a similar basis can be constructed for complex spaces and the implications of using complex entries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the canonical basis for R3 can also serve as a basis for C3.
  • Another participant questions whether a basis similar to that of R3 can be constructed with complex entries.
  • A response suggests that the same basis can be used, emphasizing that the scalars are complex numbers.
  • Further, it is proposed that replacing the entries with complex numbers, such as using i's, still maintains the basis properties, provided the vectors are linearly independent.
  • There is a mention of the possibility of creating an orthonormal basis, which requires vectors to be of unit length and orthogonal to each other.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the construction of a basis for complex spaces, with some asserting that the existing basis can be adapted while others seek clarification on the specifics of constructing such a basis.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the specifics of constructing a basis with complex entries, nor does it clarify the conditions under which the proposed bases would be orthonormal.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there,
In 3-dimensional real linear space, the simplest bases can be taken as the canonical bases

[tex]\hat{x} = \left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right), \qquad \hat{y} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1 \\0\end{matrix}\right), \qquad \hat{z} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)[/tex]

I wonder what's the simplest counterpart for 3-dimensional in complex (hilbert) space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the basis you gave for R^3 is also a basis for C^3
 
Thanks. But can we construct a basis similar to those for R^3 but with the entries be complex? and how?
 
The exact same basis will do. Remember that your scalars are complex numbers.
 
KFC said:
Thanks. But can we construct a basis similar to those for R^3 but with the entries be complex? and how?

sure, if you replace your 1's with i's it's still a basis. all you have to do is pick 3 vectors so that no one of them is a linear combination of the other 2. if you want it to be an orthonormal basis (which is usually useful) then you need to also make sure that each vector is of unit length and orthogonal to the other 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K