About bases of complex (Hilbert) space

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there,
In 3-dimensional real linear space, the simplest bases can be taken as the canonical bases

[tex]\hat{x} = \left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right), \qquad \hat{y} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1 \\0\end{matrix}\right), \qquad \hat{z} = \left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)[/tex]

I wonder what's the simplest counterpart for 3-dimensional in complex (hilbert) space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the basis you gave for R^3 is also a basis for C^3
 
Thanks. But can we construct a basis similar to those for R^3 but with the entries be complex? and how?
 
KFC said:
Thanks. But can we construct a basis similar to those for R^3 but with the entries be complex? and how?

sure, if you replace your 1's with i's it's still a basis. all you have to do is pick 3 vectors so that no one of them is a linear combination of the other 2. if you want it to be an orthonormal basis (which is usually useful) then you need to also make sure that each vector is of unit length and orthogonal to the other 2.