As I understand it, the magnitude of an [itex] L_z [/itex] eigenfunction's value is independent of its argument's [itex] \phi [/itex] coordinate (the longitude). Or, to paraphrase Richard L. Liboff (section 9.3 of Introductory Quantum Mechanics), when a system is in an eigenstate of [itex] L_z, | Y _{l} ^{m} | [/itex] is rotationally symmetric about the z axis.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

So then, if I perform an [itex] L_z [/itex] measurement on a particle which is near the origin of some spherical coordinate system and its state changes to an [itex] L_z [/itex] eigenstate, and then I immediately perform a position measurement, the probability of finding it with any particular [itex] \phi [/itex] coordinate (plus or minus whatever [itex] \phi [/itex] angle you choose) is the same.

But what if the particle's original location is very far from the origin, or if it's very massive, or both? Could performing a quantum mechanical observation cause it move all the way to the other side of the origin, for example?

This question seems like it has something to do with the correspondence principle - or perhaps the apparent violation of it - but I cannot quite see it through.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About measuring angular momentum

Loading...

Similar Threads - measuring angular momentum | Date |
---|---|

I Measurement Values for z-component of Angular Momentum | Nov 18, 2017 |

I Possible measurements of z-component of angular momentum | May 4, 2016 |

Successive Measurements of angular momentum | Nov 19, 2012 |

Measuring orbital angular momentum | Nov 4, 2011 |

Bizzard measurement outcome of Angular Momentum, Why? | Nov 11, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**