I About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in Hamiltonian mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concepts of "on-shell" and "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics. An "on-shell" trajectory in phase space is defined by the relationship between generalized coordinates and momenta as dictated by Hamilton's equations, while "off-shell" trajectories do not adhere to these constraints and can be treated as independent variables. This distinction is crucial for understanding path integral evaluations in quantum mechanics, where off-shell paths may involve virtual particles and scenarios like quantum tunneling. The conversation highlights the importance of these concepts in both classical mechanics and quantum theory. Understanding these terms enhances the comprehension of dynamics within Hamiltonian mechanics.
cianfa72
Messages
2,805
Reaction score
296
TL;DR Summary
About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics
In the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of "on-shell" vs "off-shell" is involved in the calculation.

I searched it for like off-shelf, however it seems it makes sense in the context of four-momentum in special relativity.

What is the meaning of that concept in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics ? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cianfa72 said:
TL;DR Summary: About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics

In the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of "on-shell" vs "off-shell" is involved in the calculation.

I searched it for like off-shelf, however it seems it makes sense in the context of four-momentum in special relativity.

What is the meaning of that concept in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics ? Thanks.
I'm not an expert on Hamiltonian Mechanics but as I understand it, we have a phase space with coordinates ##(q_i,p_i)##. A trajectory is a path through phase space parametrized by time.

Such a path is considered on shell if ##\frac{dq_i}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}##.

With a typical Hamiltonian of ##H = m/2\sum p_i^2 + V(q_i)## this just reduces to ##\frac{dq_i}{dt} = p_i/m = \dot{q_i}##.

TLDR, On shell is restricted to paths where q and p are related via the Hamiltonian and off-shell refers to an arbitrary path through phase space where q and p aren't necessarily related and are treated as independent variables.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and cianfa72
Ah ok, so basically the "time evolution" of an "on-shell" trajectory through phase space is "constrained" from Hamilton's equations.
 
cianfa72 said:
Ah ok, so basically the "time evolution" of an "on-shell" trajectory through phase space is "constrained" from Hamilton's equations.
Mostly on-shell and off-shell are used to distinguish between different kinds of path integral evaluations in quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, paths that would be forbidden by conservation laws are still possible so long as the end point where an observation if made complies with the relevant conservation laws.

In particular, off-shell analysis considers "virtual" paths from one state to another, sometimes involving "virtual particles." One of the most common cases where an off-shell analysis is needed is in quantum tunneling situations, and in W boson transitions where the system lacks the mass-energy to create a real, on-shell W boson in an intermediate step.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top