I About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in Hamiltonian mechanics

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the concepts of "on-shell" and "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics. An "on-shell" trajectory in phase space is defined by the relationship between generalized coordinates and momenta as dictated by Hamilton's equations, while "off-shell" trajectories do not adhere to these constraints and can be treated as independent variables. This distinction is crucial for understanding path integral evaluations in quantum mechanics, where off-shell paths may involve virtual particles and scenarios like quantum tunneling. The conversation highlights the importance of these concepts in both classical mechanics and quantum theory. Understanding these terms enhances the comprehension of dynamics within Hamiltonian mechanics.
cianfa72
Messages
2,878
Reaction score
302
TL;DR
About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics
In the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of "on-shell" vs "off-shell" is involved in the calculation.

I searched it for like off-shelf, however it seems it makes sense in the context of four-momentum in special relativity.

What is the meaning of that concept in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics ? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cianfa72 said:
TL;DR Summary: About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics

In the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of "on-shell" vs "off-shell" is involved in the calculation.

I searched it for like off-shelf, however it seems it makes sense in the context of four-momentum in special relativity.

What is the meaning of that concept in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics ? Thanks.
I'm not an expert on Hamiltonian Mechanics but as I understand it, we have a phase space with coordinates ##(q_i,p_i)##. A trajectory is a path through phase space parametrized by time.

Such a path is considered on shell if ##\frac{dq_i}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}##.

With a typical Hamiltonian of ##H = m/2\sum p_i^2 + V(q_i)## this just reduces to ##\frac{dq_i}{dt} = p_i/m = \dot{q_i}##.

TLDR, On shell is restricted to paths where q and p are related via the Hamiltonian and off-shell refers to an arbitrary path through phase space where q and p aren't necessarily related and are treated as independent variables.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and cianfa72
Ah ok, so basically the "time evolution" of an "on-shell" trajectory through phase space is "constrained" from Hamilton's equations.
 
cianfa72 said:
Ah ok, so basically the "time evolution" of an "on-shell" trajectory through phase space is "constrained" from Hamilton's equations.
Mostly on-shell and off-shell are used to distinguish between different kinds of path integral evaluations in quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, paths that would be forbidden by conservation laws are still possible so long as the end point where an observation if made complies with the relevant conservation laws.

In particular, off-shell analysis considers "virtual" paths from one state to another, sometimes involving "virtual particles." One of the most common cases where an off-shell analysis is needed is in quantum tunneling situations, and in W boson transitions where the system lacks the mass-energy to create a real, on-shell W boson in an intermediate step.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K