I About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in Hamiltonian mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concepts of "on-shell" and "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics. An "on-shell" trajectory in phase space is defined by the relationship between generalized coordinates and momenta as dictated by Hamilton's equations, while "off-shell" trajectories do not adhere to these constraints and can be treated as independent variables. This distinction is crucial for understanding path integral evaluations in quantum mechanics, where off-shell paths may involve virtual particles and scenarios like quantum tunneling. The conversation highlights the importance of these concepts in both classical mechanics and quantum theory. Understanding these terms enhances the comprehension of dynamics within Hamiltonian mechanics.
cianfa72
Messages
2,822
Reaction score
298
TL;DR Summary
About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics
In the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of "on-shell" vs "off-shell" is involved in the calculation.

I searched it for like off-shelf, however it seems it makes sense in the context of four-momentum in special relativity.

What is the meaning of that concept in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics ? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cianfa72 said:
TL;DR Summary: About the meaning "on-shell" vs "off-shell" in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics

In the derivation of Hamiltonian mechanics, the concept of "on-shell" vs "off-shell" is involved in the calculation.

I searched it for like off-shelf, however it seems it makes sense in the context of four-momentum in special relativity.

What is the meaning of that concept in the context of Hamiltonian/Lagrangian mechanics ? Thanks.
I'm not an expert on Hamiltonian Mechanics but as I understand it, we have a phase space with coordinates ##(q_i,p_i)##. A trajectory is a path through phase space parametrized by time.

Such a path is considered on shell if ##\frac{dq_i}{dt} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}##.

With a typical Hamiltonian of ##H = m/2\sum p_i^2 + V(q_i)## this just reduces to ##\frac{dq_i}{dt} = p_i/m = \dot{q_i}##.

TLDR, On shell is restricted to paths where q and p are related via the Hamiltonian and off-shell refers to an arbitrary path through phase space where q and p aren't necessarily related and are treated as independent variables.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and cianfa72
Ah ok, so basically the "time evolution" of an "on-shell" trajectory through phase space is "constrained" from Hamilton's equations.
 
cianfa72 said:
Ah ok, so basically the "time evolution" of an "on-shell" trajectory through phase space is "constrained" from Hamilton's equations.
Mostly on-shell and off-shell are used to distinguish between different kinds of path integral evaluations in quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, paths that would be forbidden by conservation laws are still possible so long as the end point where an observation if made complies with the relevant conservation laws.

In particular, off-shell analysis considers "virtual" paths from one state to another, sometimes involving "virtual particles." One of the most common cases where an off-shell analysis is needed is in quantum tunneling situations, and in W boson transitions where the system lacks the mass-energy to create a real, on-shell W boson in an intermediate step.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top