B About the naive definition of probability

red65
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
hello, I took an introductory course about statistics, we viewed the naive definition of probability which says "it requires equally likely outcomes and can't handle an infinite sample space ", I understood that it requires finite sample space but I didn't understand "equally likely outcomes ", does it mean that if we have a coin with no equally likely heads and tales that do not satisfy the naive definition?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's right, a biased coin cannot be modeled as two events, one heads and one tails, because in the naive model all events are equally likely.

You can kind of jam it in if you squint, e.g. ifthe coin is 2/3 to be heads, then have events H1 and H2 which are both the coin landing heads, and T which is the coin landing tails. But H1 vs H2 is not an observable difference.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes red65 and PeroK
ok, thanks a lot!
 
You can call it "naive" but it is an important, basic subset of the problems. And many problems are a series of steps where each step is of that type. But it will not get you very far; there are too many problems that are not like that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top