Absolute Convergence of z: \mathbb{N}^2 to \mathbb{C}

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AKG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Convergence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the absolute convergence of the function z: ℕ² → ℂ, specifically examining whether the absolute convergence of sums in multiple orders leads to the same result. The participants confirm that if the conditions of absolute convergence for sums over natural numbers n and j are met, then it can be concluded that the double sum converges absolutely as well. Counterexamples are provided to illustrate situations where the conditions may not hold, emphasizing the importance of understanding the implications of the Fubini-Tonelli Theorem in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of absolute convergence in series
  • Fubini-Tonelli Theorem application
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis concepts
  • Familiarity with double series and their convergence properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fubini-Tonelli Theorem in detail
  • Explore counterexamples in series convergence
  • Review the conditions for absolute convergence in double series
  • Investigate necessary and sufficient conditions for convergence in mathematical literature
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the convergence properties of series and functions defined on multi-dimensional domains.

AKG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,559
Reaction score
4
Let z : \mathbb{N}^2 \to \mathbb{C}. Suppose that:

1) for all natural n, \sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}}z(n,j) converges absolutely.

2) for all natural j, \sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}}z(n,j) converges absolutely.

3) \sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right ) converges absolutely.

Can we conclude that

4) \sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right ) converges absolutely as well, with

\sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right ) = \sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right )
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a question here? If you want to prove it, see Folland's "Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications. For errata, see Folland's website.
 
Yes there is a question here, see statement 4.
 
answer to statement !?

I reads like an application of the Fubini -Tonelli Thm. (and no question mark).
 
"Can we conclude that..."...if your picky stick a question mark on the end.
 
AKG said:
Let z : \mathbb{N}^2 \to \mathbb{C}. Suppose that:

Can we conclude that

4) \sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right ) converges absolutely as well, with

\sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right ) = \sum _{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left (\sum _{j \in \mathbb{N}} z(n,j)\right )
?
 
I claim there exists a z such that:

\forall n: \sum_j z(n, j) = 0

\forall j: \sum_n z(n, j) = 1

are all absolutely convergent sums. And clearly a sum of zeroes is absolutely convergent...


If you're going to come up with a counter-example, look for a simple one! I didn't come up with this one until I stopped trying to make clever counter-examples.




(In fact, we can arrange it so that each sum has a finite number of nonzeroes!)
 
The way to think about counter examples for these is to think about the lattice of NxN, and summing rows, then columns etc. It is usually quite easy to come up with counter examples. My counter example was this:

z(1,j)= 1-1+0+0+0...
z(2,j)=0+0+1-1+0+0+...each horizontal sum is zero. The vertical sums are alternately 1,-1,1,-1,... which doesn't converge, never mind absolutely.
 
Thanks guys! I had a problem where part of it had a z(n,j) satisfying 1-3 and I needed it to satisfy 4. Fortunately, I had other hypotheses to work with and I ended up using those to get 4. But it was good seeing your counterexamples. In general, what conditions do we need to get 4? PlanetMath gives a sufficient condition http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/DoubleSeries.html , is there a concise way to express a necessary and sufficient condition?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Now the question makes sense, the statement 3) was not clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K