Absorption of beta particles by lead

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the absorption of beta particles emitted from a strontium-90 source when passed through varying thicknesses of lead. Experiment results showed unexpected count rates: 0.69 counts per second at 2.1mm, 19.7cps at 3.0mm, 15.4cps at 6.8mm, and 10.0cps at 13.8mm. Participants noted that the count rate should decrease with increased lead thickness, contradicting the observed data. The discussion raises questions about potential strontium decay into yttrium-90, bremsstrahlung radiation effects, and the importance of experimental setup geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beta particle emission and energy levels, specifically from strontium-90.
  • Knowledge of radiation attenuation principles, particularly with lead as a shielding material.
  • Familiarity with the concept of bremsstrahlung radiation and its implications in radiation detection.
  • Experience with radiation detection equipment and the factors affecting count rate measurements.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the decay process of strontium-90 and its transition to yttrium-90.
  • Study the principles of radiation attenuation and the specific interactions of beta particles with lead.
  • Learn about bremsstrahlung radiation and its significance in radiation shielding scenarios.
  • Investigate the proper setup for radiation detection experiments, focusing on geometry and detector sensitivity.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, radiation safety officers, and anyone involved in experimental nuclear physics or radiation detection will benefit from this discussion.

Elbow_Patches
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
What thickness of lead would you expect a strontium-90 beta source to penetrate?
Hello everyone,

We conducted an experiment with a strontium-90 source and some different thicknesses of lead.
With 2.1mm of lead the count rate (corrected for the background) was 0.69 counts per second,
3.0mm 19.7cps
6.8mm 15.4cps
13.8mm 10.0 cps

This would indicate that the thicker the lead, the more the absorption, the lower the count. Which makes sense, but shouldn't the 2.1mm have been thick enough to stop all beta particles from passing through? According to some data I've found (figure 1) for a beta particle to penetrate 1mm of lead would require an energy of about 1-2 MeV, when you'd expect an Sr-90 source to emit them with about 0.5MeV.

So, what do you think? Are these results normal and to be expected (not the opinion of others in my department)? Has the strontium decayed into something that emits gamma? Has the strontium decayed into yttrium which then emits gamma with about 2.3MeV (so according to figure 1 it would penetrate through 1-2mm of lead)? Is the beta striking the lead and producing bremsstrahlung radiation? Something else I haven't thought of?

Any help, suggestions or musings are welcome. :)

1583424742323.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps all of the lead thicknesses stopped all of the beta particles and all of your measurements are just background. What was the count rate with no lead?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
Elbow_Patches said:
Summary:: What thickness of lead would you expect a strontium-90 beta source to penetrate?

With 2.1mm of lead the count rate (corrected for the background) was 0.69 counts per second,
3.0mm 19.7cps
I suspect a typographical error here. Surely increasing the thickness of lead by nearly 50% doesn’t increase the count rate by more than 20x. :))
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Bremsstrahlung doesn't get far in lead.

Y-90 has a half life of just 64 hours, if your source isn't brand new then it will be in equilibrium and you get one Y-90 decay per Sr-90 decay. It is mainly a beta emitter at up to 2.3 MeV (to the stable Zr-90), the emission of a photon is very rare.

Something went wrong with your count rates if the weakest shielding produced by far the lowest count rate.
 
Bremsstrahlung? A few mm of lead will not attenuate 0.5 to 2 MeV Brems radiation very much. The attenuation of 0.5 MeV x-rays of 1mm Pb is only about 0.8. There even might be some characteristic x-rays too in the range 70 -90 KeV.

As with any attenuation measurement the geometry of the setup, source to attenuator distance, collimation of the beam and attenuator to detector distance, is important as well as the detector sensitivity to various types of radiation.
 
jtbell said:
Surely increasing the thickness of lead by nearly 50% doesn’t increase the count rate by more than 20x.

I think we should suspend speculation until the OP posts the correct numbers. Explaining the wrong thing may be more confusing than helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K