Abstract Algebra, Division Ring question

In summary, the conversation discusses a proof that R, a set of 2x2 matrices with specific elements, is a division ring if and only if a certain equation has only the trivial solution. The conversation mentions using the determinant and linear independence in the proof and acknowledges that R is a field without commutativity. The solution is not yet complete, as the conversation discusses being stuck on showing that the only rational solution to the equation is the trivial solution.
  • #1
2
0

Homework Statement


Let R = { [ a + b*sqrt(m) c + d*sqrt(m) ] }
[ n(c - d*sqrt(m)) a - b*sqrt(m) ]
(Sorry if the matrix is unclear... I can't get it space nicely. r11 = a + b*sqrt(m) r12 = c + d*sqrt(m)
r21 = n(c -d*sqrt(m)) and r22 = a-b*sqrt(m) )
where a, b, c, d are elements of the rationals, and m, n elements of the integers, m and n not zero.

Show R is a division Ring if and only if the equation x^2 - m*y - n*z^2 +m*n*t = 0 has no other rationals solution except x = y = z = t = 0 ( The trivial solution.)

Homework Equations


Going to use the determinant in the forward direction of the proof.
Possibly need linear independence.
A division Ring is simply a field without commutativity.( I know a lot of people call it a skew-field)

The Attempt at a Solution



(====>)
So i working on the forward direction and the only way R is a division ring if that matrix is invertible.
So the determinant of that matrix would be a^2 - m*b^2 - (n*c^2 -n*d^2*m).

So we have a^2 -m*b^2 -n*c^2 +n*m*d^2 = 0. So i set it equal to 0.
(that equation looks pretty similar to the one I need.) So i guess i need to show that
a = b = c = d = 0 is the only rational solution. It seems i need to show a,b,c,d are linearly independent maybe but I am stuck but I feel its so close to being finished.

(<===) So assume the equation x^2 - m*y - n*z^2 +m*n*t = 0 has only the trivial solution. So we have a linear combination set equal to zero and the only solution is the trivial solution right?
So i guess then x, y, z, t are linearly independent? I am not sure where this is going to get me to that R is a division Ring I am really completely stuck on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have no idea why no one is willing to help me with this problem I am extremely close.
 

Suggested for: Abstract Algebra, Division Ring question

Replies
5
Views
675
Replies
2
Views
444
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
947
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top