Abstract algebra: elements of fiber writable as

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on demonstrating that elements of a fiber, specifically the fiber above an element \( a \) in a homomorphism \( \varphi \), can be expressed as a product of a given element of the fiber and an element from the kernel \( K \). The key conclusion is that for any \( x, y \in \varphi^{-1}(a) \), it can be shown that \( y^{-1}x \in \ker \varphi \) by using the property of homomorphisms. This approach provides an alternative proof to the theorem relating left cosets of \( K \) in \( G \) to \( G/K \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of homomorphisms in abstract algebra
  • Familiarity with kernels of homomorphisms
  • Knowledge of fibers and preimages in the context of functions
  • Basic concepts of group theory, particularly cosets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of homomorphisms in abstract algebra
  • Research the concept of kernels in group theory
  • Explore alternative proofs of the theorem relating left cosets and quotient groups
  • Learn about the implications of fibers in the context of algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, students studying group theory, and anyone interested in alternative proofs of algebraic theorems.

HJ Farnsworth
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
Greetings,

For a homomorphism \varphi, I'm trying to show that elements of a fiber, say the fiber above a, X_a, are writable as a given element of X_a times an element of the kernel K. So, if a\in X_a and b\in X_a, then \exists k\in K such that b=ak.

I want to do this without using the theorem that \{left cosets of K in G\} =G/K - in fact, one of my motivations for looking for this is that I want a different proof of this theorem then the ones that I have seen.

Does anyone know of a way to do this?

Thanks for any help that you can give.

-HJ Farnsworth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By fiber I assume you mean preimage, i.e. "the fiber above ##a##" means ##\varphi^{-1}(a)##.

Choose ##x,y \in \varphi^{-1}(a)##. We can always write ##x = y(y^{-1}x)##, so it suffices to show that ##y^{-1}x \in \ker \varphi##.

But this is easy: ##\varphi(y^{-1}x) = \varphi(y^{-1})\varphi(x) = \varphi(y)^{-1} \varphi(x) = a^{-1}a = 1##.
 
Hi jbunniii,

That is indeed what I mean by fiber. Thanks for the help, that was exactly the kind of thing I was looking for!

-HJ Farnsworth
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
661
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
748