Abstract Algebra Problem involving the ideals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the set I = {r ∈ R | f(r) ∈ J} is an ideal in the ring R, given a ring homomorphism f: R → S and an ideal J in S. The proof demonstrates that I contains the zero element, is closed under addition, and is closed under multiplication by elements of R. Additionally, it establishes that I contains the kernel of the homomorphism f, confirming that I is indeed an ideal in R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring homomorphisms
  • Knowledge of ideals in ring theory
  • Familiarity with the properties of homomorphisms, specifically f(0) = 0
  • Concept of kernel of a ring homomorphism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ring homomorphisms in greater detail
  • Learn about the structure and properties of ideals in abstract algebra
  • Explore examples of kernels of homomorphisms in various rings
  • Investigate the relationship between ideals and quotient rings
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in abstract algebra, mathematicians focusing on ring theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of ring homomorphisms and ideals.

xcr
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f:R→S be a homomorphism of rings. If J is an ideal in S and I={r∈R/f(r)∈J}, prove that I is an ideal in R that contains the kernal of f.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like I have the problem right, but would like to have someone look over it and see if I made a assumption that I shouldn't have. Here it is below:

To show I is an ideal in R, we have two show three things:

1. We have to show that 0 is in I. f(0) = 0 since f is a homomorphism. 0 is in J since J is an ideal. This means f(0) is in J, so 0 is in I.

2. We have to show that I is closed under addition, so if we have r, s in I, then r+s is also in I.
Assume that r, s, are in I. Then by definition of I, f(r) and f(s) are in J.
If we can show that f(r+s) is in J, then by definition of I, this means that r+s is in I, so this is what we need to do.
So consider f(r+s). Since f is a homomorphism, f(r+s) = f(r) + f(s). Since f(r) is in J and f(s) is in J and J is an ideal, then f(r) + f(s) is in J. This means f(r+s) is in J.
So r+s is in I, which is what we needed to show.

3. We have to show that I is closed under multiplication by elements of R, so if we have r in R and s in I, then rs is also in I.
Assume that r is in R and s is in I. If we can show that f(rs) is in J, then by definition of I, this means that rs is in I.
So consider f(rs). Since f is a homomorphism, f(rs) = f(r)f(s). Since s is in I, then f(s) is in J. Since J is an ideal, then it is closed under multiplication by elements of R, and f(r) is in R, so f(r)f(s) is in J. Thus, f(rs) is in J.
So rs is in I, which is what we needed to show.

This means that I is an ideal in R. We still need to show that I contains the kernel of f. The kernel of f are the elements {x in R | f(x) = 0}. Consider x in ker f. Then f(x) = 0. Since J is an ideal, 0 is in J, so f(x) is in J. Then, by definition, x is in R, so R contains ker f.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since J is an ideal, then it is closed under multiplication by elements of R, and f(r) is in R, so f(r)f(s) is in J.

I think you made a typo here, you mean to say the ring S but you've said R (two places). Other than that it looks good to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K