Abstract Algebra: Splitting Fields and Prime Polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of splitting fields in abstract algebra, specifically focusing on the polynomial x^4 + 1 and the polynomial x^p - 1 for prime p. Participants express confusion regarding the degree of the splitting field over the rational numbers and the nature of roots in extension fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the factorization of x^4 + 1 and question the implications for the degree of the splitting field. There are discussions about the nature of roots and whether they can exist in an extension field, as well as the criteria for determining the smallest extension field containing these roots.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the structure of the splitting field and its degree, while others are still grappling with the concepts and seeking clarification on the definitions and properties of extension fields. There is an ongoing exploration of the roots of the polynomials and their implications for the splitting fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of abstract algebra concepts and the definitions of splitting fields, with some expressing uncertainty about the relationship between rational numbers and complex roots. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations regarding the nature of the splitting field and its degree.

buzzmath
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding splitting fields. Some of the problems are find the degree of the splitting field of x^4 + 1 over the rational numbers and if p is a prime prove that the splitting field over the rationals of the polynomial x^p - 1 is of degree p-1. I'm really confused with these type of problems. Can anyone give some helpful advice?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
could you say that x^4 + 1=(x^2 + i)(x^2 - i). Since this is factored into two polynomials of degree 2 the degree of the splitting field is 2*2=4?
 
i is not a rational number. What are the roots of x^4_1? What is the smallest extension of Q that contains them?
 
can't the roots be in an extension field? isnt' the splitting field an extension field so i would be in the extension field? The roots would be x = (-1)^(1/4) but this isn't a rational number. I think because of this the extension would have to be the complex field because no real number satisfies this. How do you know if it's the smalllest extension?
 
buzzmath said:
can't the roots be in an extension field? isnt' the splitting field an extension field so i would be in the extension field? The roots would be x = (-1)^(1/4) but this isn't a rational number. I think because of this the extension would have to be the complex field because no real number satisfies this. How do you know if it's the smalllest extension?
Yes, that's the whole point. The splitting field is the smallest extension of Q that contains all of its roots. No, that splitting field is NOT the set of all complex numbers. What are the four roots of x4/sup]= -1?
 
Can you write it like w = cos(360/4)+isin(360/4) then w^4 =1 so (2)^(1/2)/2+or-(2)^(1/2)/2i are the four roots so the field is Q(2^(1/2),i) but then how do you tell the degree of this field?
 
my experience with degrees is with polynomials not an entire field
 
Good. Yes, the splitting field is [itex]Q(\sqrt{2},i)[/itex]. The smallest field containing all rational numbers, [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex], and i. In particular, that means it must include all numbers of the form [itex]a+ bi+ c\sqrt{2}[/itex] where a, b, c are rational numbers. Since it must be closed under multiplication, it must also include [itex]\isqrt{2}[/itex]. Since that cannot be written in the above form, it must, in fact, include numbers of the form [itex]a+ bi+ c\sqrt{2}+ di\sqrt{2}[/itex]. One can show that any number in this extension field can be written in that form. We can think of that as a vector space over the rational numbers with basis {1, i, [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex],[itex]i\sqrt{2}[/itex]}: i.e. the vector space has dimension 4 over the rational numbers. THAT is the "degree" of the extension field: its dimension as a vector space over the rational numbers. In this case we could also have seen that by noting that [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] and i are both "algebraic of order 2" and that they are "algebraically independent".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K