MHB Abstract Algebra Sylow Subgroup

DavidL
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a question about abstract algebra so if someone could help me answering this question please ...

Suppose P,P' are 3-Sylow subgroup, and let Q be their intersection and N the normalizer of Q. Problem: Explain why is the order of N divisible by 9 ?

Thanks for your help.

Regards,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Abstrat Algebra Sylow Subgroup

Well, in general, that's not TRUE: for example, if $P$ is normal with $|P| = 3$ in the group $G$, then $P = P' = Q$ and $N_G(P) = G$, and $9 \not\mid |G|$ (or else $P$ would have larger order).

Are you leaving part of the problem out?
 
Re: Abstrat Algebra Sylow Subgroup

Thanks for your answer but what is NG(P)=G please ?
 
Re: Abstrat Algebra Sylow Subgroup

$N_G(P)$ means the normalizer of $P$ in $G$. If $P$ is a normal subgroup, then all of $G$ normalizes $P$.
 
Re: Abstrat Algebra Sylow Subgroup

Ok but in the case of the order of G is 180.
Suppose that P,P' are 3 Sylow subgroup and let Q be there intersection and N the normalizer of Q.

Explain why is the order of N divisible by 9 ?Thanks :-)
 
Re: Abstrat Algebra Sylow Subgroup

That's a different story, now we have some more information to go on.

First, we factor 180 into primes:

$180 = 2^2\cdot 3^2\cdot 5$

This tells us that the sylow 3-subgroups have order 9.

You're probably trying to show that $G$ has a nontrivial proper normal subgroup (that is: that $G$ is not simple), so let's assume the sylow 3-subgroups are not normal in $G$.

Now, here, we can use a "trick": any group of order 9 is abelian, which means that $Q$ is normal in $P$, which means in particular, that $P$ normalizes $Q$ so that $P \subseteq N(Q)$.

Hence, by Lagrange, $9 = |P|$ divides $|N(Q)|$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top