Abundancy of Uranium 235 when the earth was formed.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SuperPokenerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Uranium
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the initial abundance of Uranium-235 (235U) relative to Uranium-238 (238U) at the time of Earth's formation, given its current abundance. The context is rooted in nuclear decay and the application of exponential decay equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of decay equations and the interpretation of the ratio of N to N0. Questions arise regarding the implications of negative values and the behavior of N over time.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the equations and the physical meaning of the variables involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the mathematical relationships, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted uncertainty regarding the correct application of decay constants and the interpretation of the abundance ratio over geological time scales. The original poster expresses frustration over not achieving the desired outcome in their homework.

SuperPokenerd
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old. If 235U is 0.65% abundant today, how abundant was it when the Earth formed? Note, in this case abundancy is defined as the ratio of Uranium 235 to Uranium 238

Homework Equations


R=N(lambda)
N=N0e^-lambda(t)
Half Life = ln(2)/lambda

The Attempt at a Solution


I am really unsure how to do this problem. I tried reworking the above equations but I was not able to get the correct answer. I need a little help getting started.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your second equation, you can divied by N0 to give N/N0. What would this quantity represent? Think about the total range of values this quantity could take on. Can N be negative? Can N>No?
 
Well, N/N0 would be the probability that a nucleus has decayed in the given period of time which in this case would be -4.5billion years if we take t=0 to be the present. And can't N be larger than N0 if we are going back in time?
 
ok, so I've worked it up to the point where I have the new abundancy = .0065e^(lambda238-lambda235)*4.5billion years but it's wrong. How can i fix this?
 
Got it wrong so now I got an 80 on my HW. Thanks for nothing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K