Calculating the Isotope Ratio of Uranium 235 and 238 4.5 Billion Years Ago

In summary: If that is correct than the ratios I wrote down above are the answer to the problem.In summary, the conversation discusses the current share and half-life times of Uranium isotopes on Earth. The goal is to calculate the ratio between the isotopes 4.5 billion years ago. After using the formula ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}## and setting up equations for the current ratio, the final answer is that the ratio between Uranium 235 and 238 at that time was ##0.9978## and ##0.0022## respectively.
  • #1
skrat
748
8

Homework Statement


Current share of Uranium isotope on Earth is 99.28% (##^{238}U##) and 0.72% (##^{235}U##), half-life times are ##7.04\cdot 10^8 years## (##^{235}U##) and ##4.468\cdot 10^9 years## (##^{238}U##). Calculate the ratio between the isotopes ##4.5\cdot 10^9 years## ago.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If hope it is ok to say that ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}##.

Let's now say that ##N_{238}(t)=Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}## where ##\lambda =\frac{t_{1/2}^{238}}{ln2}## and
##N_{235}(t)=Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}## where ##\mu =\frac{t_{1/2}^{235}}{ln2}##.

Now we know that ##\frac{N_{238}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.9928## and also ##\frac{N_{235}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.0072##

Knowing this, I can write:

##\frac{N_{238}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=\frac{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.9928## and

##\frac{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.0072##

Dividing last two gives me:

##\frac{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}}{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=\frac{0.9928}{0.0072}## and

##A=Be^{-t/\mu +t/\lambda }\frac{0.9928}{0.0072}##

Inserting this into ##\frac{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.0072## leaves me with the result that ##B=1##.

Knowing this also gives me a result for ##A##, therefore ##A=459.8##.

So... If I am not mistaken, than following ratios should be the result I am searching:

##\frac{B}{B+A}=0.9978## for Uranium 235 and ##\frac{A}{B+A}=0.0022## for Uranium 238.

Which to me is a bit confusing, so I would kindly ask somebody to tell me where I got it all wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Inserting this into ##\frac{Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}{Ae^{-\frac{t}{\lambda }}+Be^{-\frac{t}{\mu }}}=0.0072## leaves me with the result that ##B=1##
Is not correct. It leaves you with the result that 0.0072 = 0.0072, which is not extremely useful.

B = 1 is a strange answer anyway, right ?
And: you should become suspicious when your answer stipulates that the fastest decaying isotope was less abundant in the past than the other one!

And now for some more constructive stuff:
First you want to check that 238U doesn't decay into 235U, which it doesn't.
So both can be considered independent.

You have expressions for the current ratio N238 / N235.
With ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}## you also have expressions for ##N(t)/N_0## for both.
All you have to do is fill in the numbers !
 
  • #3
BvU said:
You have expressions for the current ratio N238 / N235.
With ##N(t)=N_0e^{-\frac{t}{\tau }}## you also have expressions for ##N(t)/N_0## for both.
All you have to do is fill in the numbers !

Fill in the numbers into what? o_O

All I have is ##\frac{N_{238}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.9928## and ##\frac{N_{235}(t)}{N_{238}(t)+N_{235}(t)}=0.0072##, of course dividing those two brings me to current ratio, just like you said but... ?

I don't get it what the next step is supposed to be..
 
  • #4
You reached the equation
##A=Be^{-t/\mu +t/\lambda }\frac{0.9928}{0.0072}##
which is correct. You should now plug in the known values for t, λ, and μ. and solve for A/B.
 
  • #5
Ok...

##A=3.30B##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top