Acceleration and velocity (conceptual) question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the concepts of acceleration and velocity in the context of a car skidding on a slippery road. The problem presents a scenario where a car moving at 80 km/h skids at a 30-degree angle and comes to a stop in 3.9 seconds, leading to a calculated average acceleration of 5.69 m/s². The key question raised is why only the x-component of acceleration is considered, despite the car's skid angle indicating motion in both x and y directions. It is clarified that the initial and final y-component velocities are zero, resulting in an average acceleration of zero in that direction. The discussion concludes that unbalanced forces, such as differences in braking force, can cause the car to rotate, making the situation more complex than a simple linear motion analysis.
mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
I was doing some problems out of my book and the following problem has been solved, but a little question popped up in my head. Its simply conceptual, just want to gain a deeper and truer understanding of these two fundamental ideas...

The problem goes something like this...(easy one)...Attempting to stop on a slippery road, a car moving at 80 km/h skids across the road at a 30 (degree) angle to its initial motion, coming to a stop in 3.9s. Determine the average acceleration in m/s^2, using a coordinate system with the x-axis in the direction of the car's original motion and the y-axis toward the side of the road to which the car skids.

The answer that I stumbled upon AFTER having figured out the individual components of the resultant vector is; 5.69 m/s^2.My question is: Why is it that we only take into account the acceleration coming from the x coordinate? The car doesn't stay simply along the x-axis as is noticed from the 30(degree) "skid" it makes across the road.

Shouldn't the average acceleration be figured from the resultant vector? Or is the book just leaving out specifics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial AND final y-component velocities are zero, so you could say the average is zero. There is no way to find a value for the acceleration unless given the maximum sideways speed.
 
Sorry if this is simple-minded, but what then, causes the 30 degree skid?
 
Ideally if the car is strictly driving straight to the x-axis and the brakes are applied on both the wheels with identical force, then the car shouldn't rotate at all (assuming the slippery road has no geometrical flaws). In reality this situation might be hard to achieve. So any unbalanced force arising with the difference of brakes on both wheels or slightly wrong alignment might produce a nonzero torque on the car that will start rotating it. After that its all at hands of inertia and Newtonian mechanics.
 
That makes it much more understandable. Thank you both.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top