Acceleration of a ball thrown vertically upwards

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janiceleong26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Ball
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 13K views
Janiceleong26
Messages
276
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


image.jpg

I chose A because since the acceleration of the ball is positive vertically upwards, the acceleration downwards is negative, and at the turning point, acceleration is zero.. The correct answer is B. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Janiceleong26 said:
I chose A because since the acceleration of the ball is positive vertically upwards, the acceleration downwards is negative, and at the turning point, acceleration is zero..
Perhaps you are confusing acceleration (which is the rate of change in velocity) with velocity? Why do you think the acceleration changes? Does the force change?
 
Think about this:

If the acceleration were 0 at the maximum height, the ball would just sit there suspended. Does that happen?

If the acceleration were positive as the ball rises, then it would get faster and faster as it does. Does that happen?
 
Doc Al said:
Think about this:

If the acceleration were 0 at the maximum height, the ball would just sit there suspended. Does that happen?

If the acceleration were positive as the ball rises, then it would get faster and faster as it does. Does that happen?
Oh..I get what you mean.. I thought acceleration was zero at the maximum height, because v=0.. but I shouldn't see into velocity, it's the change, thanks for the help!
 
Doc Al said:
Perhaps you are confusing acceleration (which is the rate of change in velocity) with velocity? Why do you think the acceleration changes? Does the force change?
But why, whenever we do Kinematics questions, where an object falls, we take acceleration as g= + 9.81ms^-2 ?
 
Janiceleong26 said:
But why, whenever we do Kinematics questions, where an object falls, we take acceleration as g= + 9.81ms^-2 ?
I'm not exactly sure what you are asking, so I'll mention two things:
(1) g is usually taken as a positive constant; g = 9.81ms^-2;
(2) for a falling body, the acceleration is downward with magnitude g; whether you express that downward acceleration as + or - depends on your sign convention. (Sometimes it's convenient to use "down = positive".)
 
Doc Al said:
I'm not exactly sure what you are asking, so I'll mention two things:
(1) g is usually taken as a positive constant; g = 9.81ms^-2;
(2) for a falling body, the acceleration is downward with magnitude g; whether you express that downward acceleration as + or - depends on your sign convention. (Sometimes it's convenient to use "down = positive".)
Ok thanks !