What are the units for the slope in an Acceleration vs Mass Graph?

Click For Summary
In an Atwood Simulation lab, the relationship between acceleration and mass is identified as linear, with acceleration measured in m/s² and mass in kg. The slope of the graph is calculated as m/kg·s², which simplifies to N (Newtons), confirming the relationship. The experiment's setup involves two masses on either side of a pulley, with one mass varying while the combined mass remains constant, leading to a straight line on the graph. Although the unit m/kg·s² may seem unusual, it is correct for this context. Understanding these units is crucial for accurately interpreting the results of the lab.
guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Using Quick graph, plot a graph of acceleration vs. ∆m, using the Part I data. Based on your analysis of the graph, what is the relationship between the mass difference and the acceleration of an Atwood’s machine? Do a linear best fit, and report the slope value (don’t forget the units).
Relevant Equations
a=m/s^2
m=kg
I am doing an Atwood Simulation lab. I am having trouble with this part of my lab that ask the question provided.

I can tell that the relationship is linear and that as the mass increases at a constant rate the acceleration increases.

Logger pro tells me that the slope is 31.43. I am having trouble thinking about what the units would be for the slope.

Acceleration is m/s^2. Mass is in kg. I believe that since I have a fraction of a kilogram I would then have:
m/s^2 / 1/kg which would then give me N.
Is that correct? If not where am I going wrong

Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 8.16.19 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 8.16.19 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 8.16.19 PM.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 239
Physics news on Phys.org
Units for the slope, y/x, will be (whatever the units are on the y axis)/(whatever the units are on the x axis).

Out of interest, what exactly is the set up in the experiment? For a typical set up of two masses hung either side of a pulley, and varying only one mass, the acceleration should not be a linear function of the mass difference.
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper
haruspex said:
Units for the slope, y/x, will be (whatever the units are on the y axis)/(whatever the units are on the x axis).

Out of interest, what exactly is the set up in the experiment? For a typical set up of two masses hung either side of a pulley, and varying only one mass, the acceleration should not be a linear function of the mass difference.

So it would m/kg*s^2? It just seems like such an odd unit I've never seen that before.

I've attached the instructions and my data for this part of the lab. Am I doing something wrong?
 

Attachments

quittingthecult said:
So it would m/kg*s^2? It just seems like such an odd unit I've never seen that before.

I've attached the instructions and my data for this part of the lab. Am I doing something wrong?
So in this experiment the combined mass is held constant. That explains why you get a straight line.
Yes, it would be m kg-1s-2. Don't worry about how odd it looks.
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...