What are the units for the slope in an Acceleration vs Mass Graph?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The slope of an Acceleration vs Mass graph in an Atwood Simulation lab is calculated as m kg-1s-2, which is equivalent to Newtons (N). This relationship is linear when the combined mass is held constant, leading to a direct correlation between mass and acceleration. The confusion arises from the unconventional appearance of the units, but they are valid and reflect the physics of the scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law of Motion
  • Familiarity with graphing acceleration and mass
  • Knowledge of unit conversions in physics
  • Experience using Logger Pro for data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of constant mass in Atwood machine experiments
  • Learn about unit analysis in physics, specifically for force and acceleration
  • Explore the use of Logger Pro for advanced data visualization techniques
  • Study the relationship between mass and acceleration in non-linear systems
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone analyzing data from Atwood machines or similar setups.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Using Quick graph, plot a graph of acceleration vs. ∆m, using the Part I data. Based on your analysis of the graph, what is the relationship between the mass difference and the acceleration of an Atwood’s machine? Do a linear best fit, and report the slope value (don’t forget the units).
Relevant Equations
a=m/s^2
m=kg
I am doing an Atwood Simulation lab. I am having trouble with this part of my lab that ask the question provided.

I can tell that the relationship is linear and that as the mass increases at a constant rate the acceleration increases.

Logger pro tells me that the slope is 31.43. I am having trouble thinking about what the units would be for the slope.

Acceleration is m/s^2. Mass is in kg. I believe that since I have a fraction of a kilogram I would then have:
m/s^2 / 1/kg which would then give me N.
Is that correct? If not where am I going wrong

Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 8.16.19 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 8.16.19 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2021-03-08 at 8.16.19 PM.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 252
Physics news on Phys.org
Units for the slope, y/x, will be (whatever the units are on the y axis)/(whatever the units are on the x axis).

Out of interest, what exactly is the set up in the experiment? For a typical set up of two masses hung either side of a pulley, and varying only one mass, the acceleration should not be a linear function of the mass difference.
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper
haruspex said:
Units for the slope, y/x, will be (whatever the units are on the y axis)/(whatever the units are on the x axis).

Out of interest, what exactly is the set up in the experiment? For a typical set up of two masses hung either side of a pulley, and varying only one mass, the acceleration should not be a linear function of the mass difference.

So it would m/kg*s^2? It just seems like such an odd unit I've never seen that before.

I've attached the instructions and my data for this part of the lab. Am I doing something wrong?
 

Attachments

quittingthecult said:
So it would m/kg*s^2? It just seems like such an odd unit I've never seen that before.

I've attached the instructions and my data for this part of the lab. Am I doing something wrong?
So in this experiment the combined mass is held constant. That explains why you get a straight line.
Yes, it would be m kg-1s-2. Don't worry about how odd it looks.
 
  • Like
Likes guyvsdcsniper

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
498
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
915
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K