According to which criteria should I choose a laser diode?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around selecting an appropriate laser diode and lens system for an AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) project, specifically focusing on the requirements for a cantilever of significant dimensions. Participants explore various criteria for laser selection, including wavelength compatibility, beam profile, and the implications of using fiber coupling.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the importance of selecting a laser wavelength that matches the bandwidth of the photodetector.
  • Another suggests that a laser with a pure Gaussian mode is preferable, indicated by the ##M^2## parameter, but acknowledges that this is not a strict requirement if fiber coupling is used.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of using polarization-maintaining fibers, with one participant stating that all polarization-maintaining fibers are single mode, but not all single mode fibers are polarization maintaining.
  • Concerns are raised about the output power of the chosen laser and its compatibility with the detector's sensitivity, particularly when using a quadrant photodetector.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the terminology of single mode lasers versus lasers coupled to single mode fibers, emphasizing the differences in their operational characteristics.
  • Participants discuss the suitability of a specific quadrant detector, analyzing its spectral responsivity and dynamic range in relation to the chosen laser's output power.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the position resolution achievable with the setup and suggests checking the rise time of the detector with an advisor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of matching the laser's wavelength to the photodetector and the potential benefits of fiber coupling. However, there are differing views on the necessity of polarization-maintaining fibers and the implications of the laser's output power and detector specifications, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for further clarification on optimal beam waist for the cantilever dimensions and the specific requirements for the AFM setup, which remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers and practitioners in the fields of microscopy, optical engineering, and those involved in the design and implementation of AFM systems.

Aymangh994
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone,
I don't know which laserdiode and lens system should I choose for my Project. It is all about AFM Microscopy with a cantilever ( Length= 450 um, width = 50 um and thickness= 2um). So as you see it is not a small cantilever. As far as I Know, the larger the cantilever is, a larger spot will be recommended. The AFM will be also operated in contact mode. Any Help will be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My limited understanding of AFM is that the laser reflects off the cantilever and that pointing is used to measure deflections of the cantilever. Is that the laser you're shopping for?

As far as criteria, I can offer you two:

1) Make sure your laser's wavelength is within the bandwidth of your photodetector.

2) Ideally, you want a laser with a pure Gaussian mode. This is specified by the ##M^2## parameter. For a pure Gaussian (TEM00) beam, ##M^2 = 1##. However, this isn't a hard requirement, as you can always couple your laser into a single-mode fiber to clean up the beam profile at the cost of losing some power (which you probably don't need much of).

As far as the lenses go, figure out the laser first, and then worry about the lenses. Do you know what beam waist is optimal for your given cantilever dimensions? We'll need that information to be able to help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aymangh994 and DaveE
I'll second the suggestion to consider fiber coupling. That could really simplify the mechanical design; or perhaps not, since we don't know about your size requirements etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aymangh994
Twigg said:
My limited understanding of AFM is that the laser reflects off the cantilever and that pointing is used to measure deflections of the cantilever. Is that the laser you're shopping for?

As far as criteria, I can offer you two:

1) Make sure your laser's wavelength is within the bandwidth of your photodetector.

2) Ideally, you want a laser with a pure Gaussian mode. This is specified by the ##M^2## parameter. For a pure Gaussian (TEM00) beam, ##M^2 = 1##. However, this isn't a hard requirement, as you can always couple your laser into a single-mode fiber to clean up the beam profile at the cost of losing some power (which you probably don't need much of).

As far as the lenses go, figure out the laser first, and then worry about the lenses. Do you know what beam waist is optimal for your given cantilever dimensions? We'll need that information to be able to help.
Hello, Thank you for you answer. I really appreciate it. I have another question: Is this laser diode https://www.sukhamburg.com/products/details/51nano-N-660-1-M01-P-5-2-28-0-150
a single mode laser ?? I found an article, which is about laser diode in AFM. As recommendation from my professor was this laser diode, but the problem is, that the fiber type is polarization maintaining and not a single mode fiber.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All polarization-maintaining fibers are single mode fibers. Not all single mode fibers are polarization maintaining.

Huh, I didn't know Schaefter Kirchoff was making lasers. Cool!

Polarization maintaining (PM) fiber is probably unnecessary but not harmful for your application (if I understand it correctly, of course).

I don't see anything obviously wrong with this choice of laser. The output power is pretty low. Make sure your detector can reasonably resolve this little optical power. This is especially true if you intend to use a quadrant photodetector.

From the noise floor of the detector and the detector's responsivity at 660nm (and transimpedance gain), you can estimate how sensitive your setup will be to displacements of the laser beam. Divide that number by the total distance between the cantilever and the detector, and you have your setup's sensitivity to deflections of the cantilever.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aymangh994
Also, just a note about terminology:

Aymangh994 said:

A "laser that has been coupled to a single mode fiber" and a "single mode laser" are two very different things. A single mode laser (usually) means a laser that only emits light in one resonator mode at a time (when tuned properly). In contrast, a multimode laser would have a spectrum that consists of several resonator modes, each with different frequency. Just a heads up to save you confusion down the road.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aymangh994
thanks a lot for you valuable information. I have chosen this quadrant detector. https://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/ssd/s1880_s2044_kpsd1015e.pdf
Do you see any problem with that?
 
Did you mean the S1880 or the S2044? These are two different detectors.

This detector looks good! Here's how you can tell:

Look at the spectral responsivity curve in the datasheet, and see what the responsivity (in amperes of photocurrent per watt of incident optical power, so A/W) is at the laser wavelength of 660nm:
Capture1.PNG

The red markup is me. You can see the responsivity (they call it photosensitivity, I've always seen it called responsivity) is about 0.45 A/W. So the full output power that S&K diode, which was 0.9mW, will produce 405##\mathrm{\mu A}## of photocurrent.

Now look at the following table:
Capture2.PNG

Notice that the saturation photocurrent is 0.5 mA. This means that with the full power of your laser (0.9mW, which creates 0.405mA of current), you will be using 80% of the dynamic range of the detector. That's a nice, beefy signal to start with.

It's not clear to me exactly how good a position resolution you will get with your setup, but based on their specification and the conditions they measured it in, I would be surprised if you saw much worse than a few ##\mathrm{\mu m}## resolution.

I don't know how fast an AFM moves, but one other thing to maybe check with your advisor or coworkers is whether 1.5 microseconds rise time is fast enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aymangh994 and DaveE
Thank you very much for these Information. I really appreciate it
Actually this helped me a lot so a massive thank you once more
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg and Baluncore

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K