Accumulated environmental damage to Hubble main mirror

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the long-term effects of radiation and microdust exposure on the Hubble Space Telescope's main mirror, which has been in orbit for 24 years. Despite initial concerns about degradation due to the space environment, there has been no measurable decline in the mirror's performance or image quality, as confirmed by astronomers and servicing missions. The Hubble was designed for a 15-year lifespan, yet its optical integrity remains intact, suggesting that the anticipated environmental damage has not occurred as expected.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical degradation and its impact on image quality
  • Familiarity with the Strehl ratio and its significance in telescope performance
  • Knowledge of the Hubble Space Telescope's design and operational history
  • Awareness of the effects of cosmic rays and orbital debris on space instruments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the techniques used for monitoring optical degradation in space telescopes
  • Explore the principles of surface roughness and its effect on light scattering
  • Investigate the materials used in high-precision mirrors and their resistance to environmental factors
  • Learn about the potential for retrieving and analyzing the Hubble after its operational life
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, optical engineers, and space mission planners interested in the longevity and maintenance of space-based telescopes.

Ganesh Ujwal
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I'm interested in understanding what effect does long-term radiation and microdust exposure would do to the surface roughness of a high-precision mirror like the one on the Hubble. Since it has been on orbit for 24 years, it provides an unique opportunity to estimate accumulated environmental damage to high-quality mirror surfaces in general.

Since surface roughness is directly related to scattering losses and Strehl ratio, I figure that a measurable decay of image quality and total luminosity would enable an estimate of this.

Do astronomers working on the Hubble track for optical degradation of the optics? if yes, what techniques do they use? what fraction of that degradation is actually related to mirror degradation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
From here: http://www.spacetelescope.org/about/faq/
How do you protect and clean the lens of the Hubble Space Telescope?
Hubble doesn’t have a lens. Like all large telescopes, Hubble uses a curved mirror to focus starlight. This mirror is located deep inside the telescope, protected by its long tube-like structure. As there is no atmosphere around Hubble, there is no risk of dust or corrosion reaching inside.

Also, from here: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11169&page=12

Hubble was designed with an anticipated 15-year lifetime based on the expected integrity of the main mirror. It was believed that over HST’s 15-year life the space environment in low Earth orbit would cause sufficient degradation of the mirror that the telescope’s light-gathering capabilities would be severely damaged by cosmic rays and orbital debris. To date, since the first shuttle servicing mission’s correction for a significant aberration in the mirror, there has been no measurable degradation.

From these two sources, I'd say no, there is no measurable degradation of the mirrors.
 
It would be splendid if the Hubble could be retrieved when it is finally retired, It would not only look splendid in the Smithsonian, but, I expect engineers would have a field day assessing and understanding material effects [or lack thereof] of long term exposure in low Earth orbit. Perhaps we could boost it to a more permanent orbit until retrieval became feasible. It would be a shame to turn it into a funeral pyre crashing back to earth.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
66
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K