I Adding 'z' to 2D graph equation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter pairofstrings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    equation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the inability to visualize a 3D graph from the equation x^2y^2z + x^2yz^2 + xyz = 1 in certain graphing systems. Users express confusion about why the graph does not appear in GeoGebra, suggesting that the software may not support the specific equation or requires different input. Clarification is sought regarding what is meant by "3D graphing system," with suggestions to use software like Mathematica for better results. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the capabilities of different graphing tools when working with complex equations. Ultimately, users are encouraged to explore alternative 3D graphing software if their current tools are inadequate.
pairofstrings
Messages
411
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
2D equation:
##x^2 y^2 + x^2 y + x y =1##
Hi.
If I write any random equation in 2D then the graph undoubtedly shows up on that 2D graphing system.
Equation example: ##x^2 y^2 + x^2 y + x y =1##

My question is: if I take the same equation: ##x^2 y^2 + x^2 y + x y =1## and if I manipulate the equation by including another variable ##'z'## in the equation like this: ##x^2 y^2 z+ x^2 y z^2+ x y z =1## then why is the 3D graph not showing up on that 3D graphing system?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pairofstrings said:
then the graph undoubtedly shows up on that 2D graphing system
What are you talking about ? What 2D graphing system ? Any visual examples ?

pairofstrings said:
then why is the 3D graph not showing up on that 3D graphing system?
Perhaps because "that" system has no telepathic capabilities ? What so you expect to see ?

##\ ##
 
pairofstrings said:
why is the 3D graph not showing up on that 3D graphing system?
BvU is right: you need to specify what "graphing system" you're asking about.

For example, Mathematica's ContourPlot and ContourPlot3D easily handle your 2D and 3D examples:
Graphs.jpg
 
Hi.
Sorry for not using math words. By saying 2D and 3D graphing system I mean 2D and 3D coordinate system.

In GeoGebra when I write random equation: ##x^2y^2z+x^2yz^2+xyz=1## I am getting a blank graph and sometimes like this (vertical axis is y-axis):
Web capture_23-8-2023_121958_www.geogebra.org.jpeg

My question is that, is it possible to draw a 3D graph of any random 3D equation like the equation: ##x^2y^2z+x^2yz^2+xyz=1##? If yes, then I will use a different 3D graphing software.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top