Addition of power series and radius of convergence

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the addition of power series and the determination of their radius of convergence. The original poster presents two series, f(x) and g(x), both with a radius of convergence of 1, and explores the limit of their difference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss manipulating the expression inside the limit before taking the limit. There are attempts to shift indices and consider the implications of the number of terms in the series.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the series and their convergence. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of finite polynomials and their convergence properties, but there is no explicit consensus on the final interpretation of the limit.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition of the complexity of the concept of radius of convergence, with some participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on the implications of their manipulations.

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42

Homework Statement



##f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n##
##g(x)=\sum_{n=253}^\infty x^n##

The radius of convergence of both is 1.

## \lim_{N \rightarrow +\infty} \sum_{n=0}^N x^n - \sum_{n=253}^N x^n##

2. The attempt at a solution

I got:
## \frac {x^{253}} {x-1}+\frac 1 {1-x}## for ##|x| \lt 1##

so the radius of convergence of the sum of these power series is just the same and equals 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you are asking for the radius of convergence of the given limit, so: No. Manipulate the expression inside the limit before taking the limit.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
Orodruin said:
I assume you are asking for the radius of convergence of the given limit, so: No. Manipulate the expression inside the limit before taking the limit.

I guess I should shift the index?

##\lim_{N \rightarrow +\infty} \sum_{n=253}^N x^{n-253}-x^n##

Then radius of convergence would be infinite?
 
That is not correct. Note that the series in your expression have a different number of terms!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
If I understand this correctly the difference between the two is:

## \sum_{n=0}^{253} x^n##

Perhaps they cancel each other except for this part?

Yeah I have noticed the number of terms isn't equal. :( Hm
 
Poetria said:
If I understand this correctly the difference between the two is:

## \sum_{n=0}^{253} x^n##

Perhaps they cancel each other except for this part?

They do indeed (except the new sum just goes to ##n = 252##). So does that sum depend on ##N##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
Orodruin said:
They do indeed (except the new sum just goes to ##n = 252##). So does that sum depend on ##N##?
Not at all. That's clear. :) Oh yes to 252. Of course.
 
Therefore it converges for every x, am I right?
 
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
  • #10
Orodruin said:
Yes.

Great. :) Many thanks. :)
 
  • #11
Poetria said:
Therefore it converges for every x, am I right?

Well, it is just a finite polynomial in x, so why would it ever diverge?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
  • #12
Ray Vickson said:
Well, it is just a finite polynomial in x, so why would it ever diverge?

:) True. I guess the concept of radius of convergence seems a bit tricky to me and I am overegging the pudding. :( Wolfram Alpha doesn't help.
 
  • #13
Poetria said:
:) True. I guess the concept of radius of convergence seems a bit tricky to me and I am overegging the pudding. :( Wolfram Alpha doesn't help.

In a way, this question is trickier than it looks. For any finite ##N > n## the difference ##S_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## is just ##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n##, a finite polynomial that exists and makes sense for all ##x##. However, when we go to the limit ##N \to \infty##, the difference ##\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} x^k## only makes sense when each of the sums converge, so only if ##|x| < 1##. On the other hand, we have##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## for ALL ##N > n##, so is true also in the limit! In other words ##\lim (\sum - \sum )## is always OK but ## (\lim \sum) - (\lim \sum) ## might not be.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
  • #14
Ray Vickson said:
In a way, this question is trickier than it looks
I would argue that this is the entire point of the question...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
  • #15
Ray Vickson said:
In a way, this question is trickier than it looks. For any finite ##N > n## the difference ##S_n(x) = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## is just ##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n##, a finite polynomial that exists and makes sense for all ##x##. However, when we go to the limit ##N \to \infty##, the difference ##\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^{\infty} x^k## only makes sense when each of the sums converge, so only if ##|x| < 1##. On the other hand, we have##1+x+x^2 + \cdots + x^n = \sum_{k=0}^N x^k - \sum_{k=n+1}^N x^k## for ALL ##N > n##, so is true also in the limit! In other words ##\lim (\sum - \sum )## is always OK but ## (\lim \sum) - (\lim \sum) ## might not be.
Many thanks for great explanation. :) I spent a lot of time thinking about it. :) Now I see what I didn't get.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K