Additional quantum states of the infinite square well

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The quantum states ##\psi(x)## of the infinite square well of width ##a## are given by

##\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin\Big(\frac{n \pi x}{a}\Big),\ n= 1,2,3, \dots##

Now, I understand ##n \neq 0##, as otherwise ##\psi(x)## is non-normalisable.

But, can't we get additional states for ##n=-1,-2,-3,\dots##?

Of course, they have the same position probability densities and energy eigenvalues as the corresponding positive $n$ states, but still, don't they *exist* at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, those are not additional states. In fact, they are the same states as they only differ by an arbitrary phase factor.
 
Well, do we not rely on the negative sign on the wavefunction to distinguish between bosons and fermions?

For bosons and fermions, we might as well call these the same particle as the wavefunction differs also by a phase factor ? :frown:
 
failexam said:
Well, do we not rely on the negative sign on the wavefunction to distinguish between bosons and fermions?
No we do not. We rely on the symmetry properties under exchange of particles in multi-particle states. Relative phase factors matter, overall phase factors do not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thanks! I get it now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K