Adjoint of a Differential Operator

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the adjoint operator D* of the derivative operator D within a specific inner product space defined on polynomials of degree up to three. The user initially struggles to express D* in a closed form for all elements of the basis but later realizes that the matrix representation of D* is simply the transpose of the matrix representation of D. Clarifications are made regarding the dimensionality of the vector space and the nature of the functions involved. The user acknowledges their learning process as a first-year graduate student and appreciates the feedback received. Ultimately, the user concludes that they have resolved their inquiry about D*.
CoachZ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
If the inner product is defined on V with dimension less than or equal to 3 as \left\langle f,g \right\rangle = \int_{0}^{1}f(x)g(x)dx, I'm trying to find D* such that \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle, and I thought I had a closed form of D*. If {1, x, (x^2)/2, (x^3)/3}. Call each element e_i, i = 0,...,3 form a basis for V, then \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle holds given D* is defined as i times the (derivative of g(x)) if g(x) has degree greater than 0, but I can't think of a closed form so that it will work for all elements. Does anyone have any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would \delta(x-1)-\delta(x)-D work?

\int_0^1 Df(x) g(x)dx = \int_0^1 (df(x)/dx) g(x)dx = f(x) g(x) |^1_0 - \int^1_0 f(x) Dg(x) dx = \int^1_0 f(x) [(\delta(x-1)-\delta(x)) - D]g(x) dx
 
CoachZ said:
If the inner product is defined on V with dimension less than or equal to 3 as \left\langle f,g \right\rangle = \int_{0}^{1}f(x)g(x)dx, I'm trying to find D* such that \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle, and I thought I had a closed form of D*. If {1, x, (x^2)/2, (x^3)/3}. Call each element e_i, i = 0,...,3 form a basis for V, then \left\langle Df,g \right\rangle = \left\langle f,D*g \right\rangle holds given D* is defined as i times the (derivative of g(x)) if g(x) has degree greater than 0, but I can't think of a closed form so that it will work for all elements. Does anyone have any suggestions?
? Please be careful to tell us exactly what you are doing! You start by talking about a vector space "V with dimension less than or equal to 3" but then start integrating? A vector space, of any dimension, does not necessarily contain functions at all. "A vector space with dimension less than or equal to 3" is NOT the same as "polynomials of degree 3 or less". (In fact, the space of polynomials of degree 3 or less has dimension four, not three, as you make clear by giving a basis consisting of four functions.)

In any case, what D* is such that <Du, v>= <u, D*v> depends upon what D is! Do you mean that D is the derivative operator?
 
HallsofIvy said:
? Please be careful to tell us exactly what you are doing! You start by talking about a vector space "V with dimension less than or equal to 3" but then start integrating? A vector space, of any dimension, does not necessarily contain functions at all. "A vector space with dimension less than or equal to 3" is NOT the same as "polynomials of degree 3 or less". (In fact, the space of polynomials of degree 3 or less has dimension four, not three, as you make clear by giving a basis consisting of four functions.)

In any case, what D* is such that <Du, v>= <u, D*v> depends upon what D is! Do you mean that D is the derivative operator?

Exactly: D is the derivative operator and I'm trying to find D*, which is simply the adjoint operator. I apologize for writing it so messily. I'm a first year graduate student still working on my writing skills, so if you have any suggestions, either for finding D* or improving writing skills, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Figured this out. Since every operator takes one some matrix representation, and we consider the orthonormal basis with respect to the differentiation operator, we can extend that basis to matrix form. But there's a theorem that states the matrix representation of D* is simply the transpose of the matrix represented by D. Therefore, I'm all set. Thanks for the suggestions!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
529
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
861
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K