- #1
velvetvelour
- 2
- 0
why would utilizing duo restriction enzymes for cloning be better then just one?
( e.coli to pBluescript II )
( e.coli to pBluescript II )
Advantages of multiple restriction enzymes for cloning
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion centers on the advantages of using multiple restriction enzymes for cloning, specifically in the context of cloning DNA into the pBluescript II vector using E. coli. Participants explore the implications of using two restriction enzymes versus one, focusing on aspects such as self-ligation and fragment orientation.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions the advantages of using two restriction enzymes for cloning compared to one.
- Another participant suggests that using two enzymes prevents the vector from self-ligating.
- A third participant proposes that pretreating the cut vector with a phosphatase can also effectively prevent self-ligation.
- It is noted that using two restriction enzymes allows for control over the orientation of the DNA fragment inserted into the vector, which is particularly beneficial for constructs intended for protein expression.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the necessity and advantages of using two restriction enzymes, with some supporting the idea while others present alternative methods to prevent self-ligation.
Contextual Notes
Some assumptions regarding the effectiveness of phosphatase treatment and the specific contexts in which orientation control is critical remain unaddressed.
Similar threads
- · Replies 1 ·
High School
Origins of the no-cloning theorem
- · Replies 6 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 4 ·
Writing: Input Wanted
Are Clone Ships a Better Alternative for Space Colonization?
- · Replies 30 ·
- · Replies 4 ·