Advice for a prospective physics major

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the considerations and advice for a prospective physics major, particularly focusing on the flexibility of a physics degree, the transition to engineering or computer science, and the prerequisites for advanced physics courses. Participants explore various educational pathways and their implications for future opportunities in academia and industry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about needing to be an analytical genius to pursue physics but feels more confident about a physics degree after receiving encouragement from a teacher.
  • Some participants suggest that a physics degree can lead to a master's in engineering, with varying ease depending on the specific engineering field.
  • There is uncertainty regarding industry opportunities for physicists, especially considering the long time frame until graduation and potential changes in the job market.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of knowing ordinary differential equations (ODE) and calculus III concepts before taking introductory modern physics, noting that it varies by institution.
  • One participant shares their experience with a modern physics course, indicating that while ODE was not heavily emphasized, it was beneficial for understanding certain concepts.
  • Another participant questions the suitability of modern physics for first-semester students and compares its difficulty to earlier physics courses.
  • There are differing opinions on the prerequisites for modern physics courses, with some suggesting that knowledge of ODE and calculus III is essential, while others indicate that it may not be strictly required.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity of ODE and calculus III before taking modern physics, as opinions vary based on individual experiences and institutional requirements. Additionally, there is no agreement on the future job market for physics graduates, reflecting uncertainty about industry opportunities.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific courses and syllabi from the University of Florida, indicating that course content and prerequisites may differ across institutions. The discussion includes references to personal experiences and varying interpretations of course requirements.

Who May Find This Useful

Prospective physics majors, students considering a double major in physics and engineering, and individuals interested in the academic and industry pathways available to physics graduates may find this discussion relevant.

Orange-Juice
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I've always loved physics but have had this (hopefully) false notion that you need to be some sort of analytical genius to get anywhere doing actual physics research so I always told myself I would just follow engineering. This past year (Junior year of high school) a degree in physics started to seem much more in reach though. A teacher recommended me to skip a year of math classes and go straight into AP Calculus BC and I plan on taking AP Physics:C Mechanics and E&M as an independent study course under the supervision of my 10th grade physics teacher (who has a degree in physics himself). I'm also pretty confident I could get into a fairly good program at one of my state universities (ranked about 30-40) if I chose to pursue a physics & math double major. I have a couple of questions about the flexibility of a physics degree though:

1) Say I finish my undergrad education and don't have the grades/GRE/etc. to get into a top 20 grad program. Is a masters in engineering (electrical or aerospace) or comp. science at a mediocre school within reach at that point even if I haven't done any research related to engineering?

2) Say I get a Phd at an okay school (ranked ~30th) what are my opportunities in industry? How about from a top 20 program?

3) Kind of unrelated but since I'm pretty ahead in high school I'm basically going to skip the entire underdivision curriculum excluding ODE, Calc 3, and Intro to modern physics. Is it okay to take all of these classes in my first semester or would that be too much? Is it necessary to know ODE and Calc. 3 concepts before taking intro to modern physics?

Thanks for any help guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can do an engineering masters with a physics degree. It doesn't hurt to take some courses to complement that if you choose to do so. Some areas would probably be easier to transition to (particularly some fields of electrical engineering) than others (for instance, it'd probably be easier to do solid state devices than communications theory).

It seems early to me to make judgements regarding industry employment for physicists. We're talking 8-11 years from now. Who knows what could change before then?You should know ODE before intro to modern physics. Your school, I imagine, would have it as a prereq (and maybe calc 3). That's just something you'd have to figure out based on what your perspective schools will require.
 
Orange-Juice said:
Is it necessary to know ODE and Calc. 3 concepts before taking intro to modern physics?

It depends on what the intro modern course is like at the school you go to. One common kind follows directly after the usual two-semester intro to classical physics (the freshman course), doesn't assume more than calculus I and II, and introduces concepts from calculus III and differential equations as needed. Another kind is more an intermediate-level course that assumes you already know calculus I-III, differential equations and linear algebra, and does more sophisticated problems. Many schools have both kinds of courses.
 
jtbell said:
It depends on what the intro modern course is like at the school you go to. One common kind follows directly after the usual two-semester intro to classical physics (the freshman course), doesn't assume more than calculus I and II, and introduces concepts from calculus III and differential equations as needed. Another kind is more an intermediate-level course that assumes you already know calculus I-III, differential equations and linear algebra, and does more sophisticated problems. Many schools have both kinds of courses.

The school I plan on attending (Uni. Of Florida) has it coming after the basic underdivision physics with calc courses but before mechanics, e&m etc.

there's no prereqs on the UF website but I found a syllabus from a few years back:
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~meisel/PHY3101-schedule-Fall-2011.html

Lots of advanced topics (GR, QM) but all the links are towards popular experiments and interesting talking points rather then anything needing very advanced math.
 
Orange-Juice said:
there's no prereqs on the UF website but I found a syllabus from a few years back:
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~meisel/PHY3101-schedule-Fall-2011.html

That looks like it's at a similar level to the course that I taught for many years, right after freshman physics but before the upper-division courses. I see from the course home page that he used the Tipler/Llewellyn book. I never used that book myself, but I remember it being at a level similar to the ones I used (first Beiser, then Taylor/Zafiratos/Dubson).
 
Orange-Juice said:
The school I plan on attending (Uni. Of Florida) has it coming after the basic underdivision physics with calc courses but before mechanics, e&m etc.

there's no prereqs on the UF website but I found a syllabus from a few years back:
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~meisel/PHY3101-schedule-Fall-2011.html

Lots of advanced topics (GR, QM) but all the links are towards popular experiments and interesting talking points rather then anything needing very advanced math.

I took Modern Physics at the University of Florida this Spring 2015 semester. ODE's did not play a major role in the course, but was useful in understanding the derivations of situations involving the Schrödinger Equation. I earned an A in the course and the professor was superb. I hope you join GatorNation!
 
paradoxymoron said:
I took Modern Physics at the University of Florida this Spring 2015 semester. ODE's did not play a major role in the course, but was useful in understanding the derivations of situations involving the Schrödinger Equation. I earned an A in the course and the professor was superb. I hope you join GatorNation!

How suitable do you think it is for a first semester student ? Or I guess a better measure of difficuly is how difficult you found it compared to physics with calc 1&2?

I hope so too, thanks! :)
 
Orange-Juice said:
How suitable do you think it is for a first semester student ? Or I guess a better measure of difficuly is how difficult you found it compared to physics with calc 1&2?

I hope so too, thanks! :)

In physics with calc (1 and 2), I only remember using separation of variables, but I did not take either course at UF. Gauss Law was heavily reliant on some knowledge of integration, however. I believe ODE should be taken after calc 3, but after calc 2 is okay, too. ODE was used more in Mechanics 1 (not the physics with calc 1).

As for how difficult I found it, it made sense, it was logical. I didn't find it too hard, but it was definitely the math class I had to study the most for. Compared to physics with calc? I remember physics 2 being fun.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K