A Advice needed for exposure time computation for galaxies

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter AdrianD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the exposure time needed for imaging the M33 galaxy using Python, specifically addressing challenges in selecting the 'n' value and calculating the solid angle Omega_i. Participants highlight that the 'n' value, which relates to the radius of the target, affects the signal received from the galaxy and counters poor seeing conditions. It is noted that increasing 'n' beyond the seeing limit maximizes the target signal, while a smaller 'n' reduces it. Additionally, there is clarification that the solid angle pertains to the area of individual pixels or groups of pixels, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding these parameters is essential for effectively determining exposure time for extended astronomical objects.
AdrianD
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
I am trying to compute the exposure time needed for an extended object (galaxy), in python.
I have found the following formulas:
Exposure time app # press the help button at the bottom of the calculator for the formulas used
Exposure time calc

Let's take for example the M33 galaxy. It has a surface mag of 23 mag/arcsec^2 and the dimension in arc minutes 73 x 45 or 4380 x 2700 arc seconds.
From the first link:
  • What I am having trouble is understanding how to choose the 'n' value, respectively the radius value? Should I choose an arbitrary value? Does the radius mean the sample of pixels from the 23 mag faint spiral arms?
From the second link:
  • I don't understand how to calculate the solid angle Omega_i for M33 galaxy. It seems the solid angle is somehow related to the the 'n' value from the first link? The formulas seem to be equivalent
Here is a sample from my code:

[CODE lang="python" title="exposure time function"]def time(self):

# k1,k2 = flux/photon energy
# flux in W/m^2/nm
# photon energy in W*sec
# filter bandwidth in nm
# telescope aperture in m^2
# mag in mag/arcsec^2
# image scale in arc sec/pixel
k1 = util.flux(self.targetMagnitude, self.angle, self.typeOfBand, self.pressure, self.temperature)[0] / util.PhotonEnergy(self.typeOfBand)
k2 = util.flux(self.skyMagnitude, self.angle, self.typeOfBand, self.pressure, self.temperature)[0] / util.PhotonEnergy(self.typeOfBand)

radius = 10 # arc sec
pixelSurface = self.imageScale**2
npix= np.pi*(radius**2/pixelSurface)

self.targetElectronsSec = self.QE * k1 * self.filterBandwidth * self.effectiveAperture
self.skyElectronsSec = self.QE * k2 * self.filterBandwidth * self.effectiveAperture * self.imageScale



#solve the equation for T
A = self.targetElectronsSec**2
B = -self.SNR**2 * (self.targetElectronsSec + npix*self.skyElectronsSec + npix*self.darkCurrent)
C = -self.SNR**2 * npix * self.readNoise**2
T = (-B + np.sqrt(B**2 - 4 * A * C)) / (2 * A) #returns seconds
return {'time':T}[/CODE]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
AdrianD said:
What I am having trouble is understanding how to choose the 'n' value, respectively the radius value? Should I choose an arbitrary value? Does the radius mean the sample of pixels from the 23 mag faint spiral arms?
Looking at the equation below the calculator, ##n## only appears in the noise terms for the sky, dark current, and readout, so it doesn't appear to have anything to do with the target. But playing around with it seems to show that ##n## only affects the target signal, which is odd. It appears that ##n## counters poor seeing. That is, increasing ##n## so that it is above the seeing will get you the full signal from the target. If ##n## is less than the seeing then you'll get less signal (e-/s). I just don't exactly know what this equation means: ##n=π(\frac{radius}{scale})^2##

AdrianD said:
I don't understand how to calculate the solid angle Omega_i for M33 galaxy. It seems the solid angle is somehow related to the the 'n' value from the first link? The formulas seem to be equivalent
I think the solid angle refers to the solid angle for each pixel (or group of pixels if binning), as it is labeled as: solid angle subtended by the integration element.

I believe an 'integration element' is a pixel or pixel group.
 
Drakkith said:
Looking at the equation below the calculator, ##n## only appears in the noise terms for the sky, dark current, and readout, so it doesn't appear to have anything to do with the target. But playing around with it seems to show that ##n## only affects the target signal, which is odd. It appears that ##n## counters poor seeing. That is, increasing ##n## so that it is above the seeing will get you the full signal from the target. If ##n## is less than the seeing then you'll get less signal (e-/s). I just don't exactly know what this equation means: ##n=π(\frac{radius}{scale})^2##I think the solid angle refers to the solid angle for each pixel (or group of pixels if binning), as it is labeled as: solid angle subtended by the integration element.

I believe an 'integration element' is a pixel or pixel group.
Signal - help I did found a help file for an older calculator.
So, for extended objects the electron counts are multiplied by the area of a pixel in arc seconds. For this we use the plate scale, that determines the size of the pixel in arc seconds. If my plate scale is 0.5 arc seconds per pixel, and the CCD pixels are square, we multiply the electron count by image_scale^2.
 
  • Like
Likes timmdeeg and Drakkith
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top