A Advice needed for exposure time computation for galaxies

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter AdrianD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the exposure time needed for imaging the M33 galaxy using Python, specifically addressing challenges in selecting the 'n' value and calculating the solid angle Omega_i. Participants highlight that the 'n' value, which relates to the radius of the target, affects the signal received from the galaxy and counters poor seeing conditions. It is noted that increasing 'n' beyond the seeing limit maximizes the target signal, while a smaller 'n' reduces it. Additionally, there is clarification that the solid angle pertains to the area of individual pixels or groups of pixels, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding these parameters is essential for effectively determining exposure time for extended astronomical objects.
AdrianD
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
I am trying to compute the exposure time needed for an extended object (galaxy), in python.
I have found the following formulas:
Exposure time app # press the help button at the bottom of the calculator for the formulas used
Exposure time calc

Let's take for example the M33 galaxy. It has a surface mag of 23 mag/arcsec^2 and the dimension in arc minutes 73 x 45 or 4380 x 2700 arc seconds.
From the first link:
  • What I am having trouble is understanding how to choose the 'n' value, respectively the radius value? Should I choose an arbitrary value? Does the radius mean the sample of pixels from the 23 mag faint spiral arms?
From the second link:
  • I don't understand how to calculate the solid angle Omega_i for M33 galaxy. It seems the solid angle is somehow related to the the 'n' value from the first link? The formulas seem to be equivalent
Here is a sample from my code:

[CODE lang="python" title="exposure time function"]def time(self):

# k1,k2 = flux/photon energy
# flux in W/m^2/nm
# photon energy in W*sec
# filter bandwidth in nm
# telescope aperture in m^2
# mag in mag/arcsec^2
# image scale in arc sec/pixel
k1 = util.flux(self.targetMagnitude, self.angle, self.typeOfBand, self.pressure, self.temperature)[0] / util.PhotonEnergy(self.typeOfBand)
k2 = util.flux(self.skyMagnitude, self.angle, self.typeOfBand, self.pressure, self.temperature)[0] / util.PhotonEnergy(self.typeOfBand)

radius = 10 # arc sec
pixelSurface = self.imageScale**2
npix= np.pi*(radius**2/pixelSurface)

self.targetElectronsSec = self.QE * k1 * self.filterBandwidth * self.effectiveAperture
self.skyElectronsSec = self.QE * k2 * self.filterBandwidth * self.effectiveAperture * self.imageScale



#solve the equation for T
A = self.targetElectronsSec**2
B = -self.SNR**2 * (self.targetElectronsSec + npix*self.skyElectronsSec + npix*self.darkCurrent)
C = -self.SNR**2 * npix * self.readNoise**2
T = (-B + np.sqrt(B**2 - 4 * A * C)) / (2 * A) #returns seconds
return {'time':T}[/CODE]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
AdrianD said:
What I am having trouble is understanding how to choose the 'n' value, respectively the radius value? Should I choose an arbitrary value? Does the radius mean the sample of pixels from the 23 mag faint spiral arms?
Looking at the equation below the calculator, ##n## only appears in the noise terms for the sky, dark current, and readout, so it doesn't appear to have anything to do with the target. But playing around with it seems to show that ##n## only affects the target signal, which is odd. It appears that ##n## counters poor seeing. That is, increasing ##n## so that it is above the seeing will get you the full signal from the target. If ##n## is less than the seeing then you'll get less signal (e-/s). I just don't exactly know what this equation means: ##n=π(\frac{radius}{scale})^2##

AdrianD said:
I don't understand how to calculate the solid angle Omega_i for M33 galaxy. It seems the solid angle is somehow related to the the 'n' value from the first link? The formulas seem to be equivalent
I think the solid angle refers to the solid angle for each pixel (or group of pixels if binning), as it is labeled as: solid angle subtended by the integration element.

I believe an 'integration element' is a pixel or pixel group.
 
Drakkith said:
Looking at the equation below the calculator, ##n## only appears in the noise terms for the sky, dark current, and readout, so it doesn't appear to have anything to do with the target. But playing around with it seems to show that ##n## only affects the target signal, which is odd. It appears that ##n## counters poor seeing. That is, increasing ##n## so that it is above the seeing will get you the full signal from the target. If ##n## is less than the seeing then you'll get less signal (e-/s). I just don't exactly know what this equation means: ##n=π(\frac{radius}{scale})^2##I think the solid angle refers to the solid angle for each pixel (or group of pixels if binning), as it is labeled as: solid angle subtended by the integration element.

I believe an 'integration element' is a pixel or pixel group.
Signal - help I did found a help file for an older calculator.
So, for extended objects the electron counts are multiplied by the area of a pixel in arc seconds. For this we use the plate scale, that determines the size of the pixel in arc seconds. If my plate scale is 0.5 arc seconds per pixel, and the CCD pixels are square, we multiply the electron count by image_scale^2.
 
  • Like
Likes timmdeeg and Drakkith
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top