Unidentified emission line in Galaxy Clusters

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the detection of an unidentified emission line in the stacked X-ray spectrum of galaxy clusters, as reported in a recent paper published in The Astrophysical Journal. The focus includes the implications of this detection for dark matter research and the challenges in interpreting the results due to modeling uncertainties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the detection of a weak unidentified emission line at energies between 3.55-3.57 keV in the XMM spectrum of 73 galaxy clusters, noting its significance across different subsamples.
  • There is mention of the possibility that the line could be attributed to the decay of sterile neutrinos, a candidate for dark matter, although this model faces challenges regarding the expected brightness of the line in certain clusters.
  • Others point out that the line's proximity to known faint lines introduces significant modeling uncertainties, complicating the interpretation of the results.
  • A specific anomaly in the Perseus cluster is discussed, where an unusually bright line at 3.62 keV may contribute to the detection of the unidentified line, although this raises further questions about its physical plausibility.
  • Participants express excitement about the implications of the findings, while also acknowledging their own limitations in fully understanding the technical details.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express interest in the topic, but there is no consensus on the interpretation of the emission line's origin or its implications for dark matter. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on specific assumptions regarding dark matter models and the challenges posed by the proximity of the unidentified line to known emission lines, which complicates the analysis.

DennisN
Gold Member
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
10,014
I could not find a thread about this (and I hope I don't start a duplicate one :smile:).
I got a mail from a friend today about this:

Detection of An Unidentified Emission Line in the Stacked X-ray spectrum of Galaxy Clusters
Esra Bulbul, Maxim Markevitch, Adam Foster, Randall K. Smith, Michael Loewenstein, Scott W. Randall
A paper was published in the July 1st issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
Arxiv link: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.2301
(Submitted on 10 Feb 2014 (v1), last revised 9 Jun 2014)

Abstract:
We detect a weak unidentified emission line at E=(3.55-3.57)+/-0.03 keV in a stacked XMM spectrum of 73 galaxy clusters spanning a redshift range 0.01-0.35. MOS and PN observations independently show the presence of the line at consistent energies. When the full sample is divided into three subsamples (Perseus, Centaurus+Ophiuchus+Coma, and all others), the line is significantly detected in all three independent MOS spectra and the PN "all others" spectrum. It is also detected in the Chandra spectra of Perseus with the flux consistent with XMM (though it is not seen in Virgo). However, it is very weak and located within 50-110eV of several known faint lines, and so is subject to significant modeling uncertainties. On the origin of this line, we argue that there should be no atomic transitions in thermal plasma at this energy. An intriguing possibility is the decay of sterile neutrino, a long-sought dark matter particle candidate. Assuming that all dark matter is in sterile neutrinos with m_s=2E=7.1 keV, our detection in the full sample corresponds to a neutrino decay mixing angle sin^2(2theta)=7e-11, below the previous upper limits. However, based on the cluster masses and distances, the line in Perseus is much brighter than expected in this model. This appears to be because of an anomalously bright line at E=3.62 keV in Perseus, possibly an Ar XVII dielectronic recombination line, although its flux would be 30 times the expected value and physically difficult to understand. In principle, such an anomaly might explain our line detection in other subsamples as well, though it would stretch the line energy uncertainties. Another alternative is the above anomaly in the Ar line combined with the nearby 3.51 keV K line also exceeding expectation by factor 10-20. Confirmation with Chandra and Suzaku, and eventually Astro-H, are required to determine the nature of this new line.(ABRIDGED)

Bonus material:
Article 1: Mystery in the Perseus Cluster (NASA article)
Article 2: Perseus Cluster: Mysterious X-ray Signal Intrigues Astronomers (Chandra article)
Article 3: Mysterious signal from the center of the Perseus Cluster unexplained by known physics (The Watchers)
Blogs: Links to some blogs that have written about it.

Just wanted to let the forum readers know about it. It got me a little excited...:-p
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
DennisN said:
Just wanted to let the forum readers know about it. It got me a little excited...:-p

Thanks for sharing! What part are you most excited about?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Thanks for sharing! What part are you most excited about?

This thing :smile::
From abstract of paper said:
On the origin of this line, we argue that there should be no atomic transitions in thermal plasma at this energy.
But I'm not even remotely qualified to say very much about it, haha!

Chronos said:
Interesting new papers do not escape notice here very often, or long: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=739043&highlight=dark+matter+detection
Excellent! :thumbs: I had a feeling it ought to have appeared on the forum :smile:. I'll make a new post in that very thread, and request for this thread to be closed.

EDIT: I've added the info in the thread by Chronos here now instead.
 
Last edited:
Thread closed at the request of the OP. Any responses to the topic can be made in the threads linked in the posts above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K