Advice on dissertation writing - should i write my own description for

Click For Summary
In dissertation writing, when including figures such as graphs from other papers, it is essential to provide proper attribution to the original source. While using the original caption from the source is acceptable, it is often beneficial to include your own interpretation or description beneath the figure to better align it with your dissertation's context. This approach allows for a clearer connection to your topic and enhances the relevance of the figure. Ultimately, combining the original information with your insights can create a more comprehensive understanding for readers.
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
Hope this is in the right place, please could someone who is familiar with writing dissertations tell me if I should use my own words underneath the Figures I have included?

For example if I have taken a graph from a paper is it ok to take the description below it also, or should I write my own interpretation below it?

Any advice on this would really be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any caption is part of the picture. You should use the caption that was with the picture and, in the body of the dissertation, explain why it is relevant to your topic and, of course, tell where you got the picture and attribute it to the author of the paper from which you got it.
 
Many thanks for the reply! Yes that's what I have at present, although many papers I have read will have a graph from a source and have their own description underneath it, so I was a little confused.

But thanks again!
 
I think it can go either way. Sometimes the original caption can be irrelevant to the context of the work you're presenting.
 
Choppy said:
I think it can go either way. Sometimes the original caption can be irrelevant to the context of the work you're presenting.

ok, think I will go with using the relevant information that is given (with citation) and if necessary including my own interpretation relevant to the topic.

Thanks again!
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K