Advice on my outline on undergraduate physics curriculum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the optimal undergraduate physics curriculum, focusing on key texts for each area of study. For Classical Mechanics, "An Introduction to Mechanics" by Kleppner and Kolenkow is recommended, though the need for additional resources on Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics is acknowledged. In Electromagnetism, "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by Griffiths is preferred, with a suggestion to consider "Electricity & Magnetism" by Purcell for an intermediate approach. Quantum Mechanics is covered by "Quantum Mechanics" by Zettili, while "Thermal Physics" by Kittel is recommended for Thermodynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Classical Mechanics concepts
  • Understanding of Electromagnetism fundamentals
  • Basic knowledge of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Introduction to Thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics using "Classical Mechanics" by Taylor or "Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Marion
  • Explore "Electricity & Magnetism" by Purcell for a deeper understanding of Electromagnetism
  • Investigate advanced Quantum Mechanics texts beyond Griffiths for a comprehensive grasp
  • Review "Thermal Physics" by Kittel for insights into Thermodynamics applications
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, educators seeking curriculum improvement, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of classical mechanics, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, and thermodynamics.

shinobi20
Messages
277
Reaction score
20
I have studied physics during my undergraduate years but I want to relearn everything as I came to my realization that I'm weak because of the quality of education I got. So far, I want to know if my order of study is good.

Classical Mechanics:
An Introduction to Mechanics by Kleppner and Kolenkow

Electromagnetism:
Introduction to Electrodynamics by Griffiths

Quantum Mechanics:
Quantum Mechanics by Zettili

Thermodynamics:
Thermal Physics by Kittel

Now my question is, does kleppner suffice as a mechanics text for the whole undergraduate curriculum (regardless of lagrangian and hamiltonian)? Because I think kleppner is good but I don't know where to study lagrangian and hamiltonian, given that kleppner already covered all Newtonian mechanics. I tried to read books by Gregory, Fowles, Finch, Taylor,etc in Classical Mechanics but I still think that Kleppner is far superior in the Newtonian part, but the problem is that it doesn't involve lagrangian and hamiltonian. Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not use two books for classical mechanics? First, use K&K for Newtonian mechanics, then switch to one of the others for Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.
 
That is a possibility which I already thought of but I'm thinking, which one is the best book to learn lagrangian and hamiltonian?
 
I used Taylor and Marion in my lagrangian/hamiltonian course. Taylor is expensive though so maybe just start with a used copy of an old edition of Marion for dirt cheap.

My undergrad electromagnetism course officially used Griffiths but I'm pretty sure our instructor got most of the lecture material and assignments from Jackson and some other obscure grad level text I can't remember at the moment.

Griffiths' quantum mechanics is also good.
 
I don't mind buying more expensive copies. I just want to know which one is better, I think Taylor is too verbose.
 
Griffiths is a more advanced book on E&M. Depending on your comfort with the introductory level material, you may be better suited to use Electricity & Magnetism by Purcell. It's an excellent intermediate level treatment that's comparable to K&K for classical mechanics in depth and difficulty.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
19K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K